Rich countries often give financial aid to poor countries, but it does not solve poverty. So rich countries should give other types of help to poor countries rather than financial aid. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Rich countries are becoming rich day by day as well as poor nations are became poor. Handful of the people, think developed countries should provide financial aid to poor countries however some believe that due to this only, these problems could not solve. However, rich states give other type of help to poor kingdoms rather than financial aid. This notion have both pros and cons. I would discuss both the views in the forthcoming paragraphs.
On the one side, a lot of masses believe that prosperous territories should give financial aid to poor countries. In this criteria, of developed countries provide this help, this become helpful for the poor nation because some nations are undeveloped due to the wars and numerous types of disasters. For instance, Afganistan country, nowadays this nation is suffering from war situations with Taliban. Whereas, some state authorities help this country in financially and give food and essential items to residents as well as owing to this war some people loss their homes therefore authorities give shelter to.
On the other hand, handful of individuals think the rich countries should give help in other ways rather than financial aid. Whereas, financial aid is also essential however, rich countries also give other types of help such as quality education, water supply and electrician facilities and so on because if developed nations give only financial aid therefore the poverty problems could not be solved. For instance, in Afghanistan, students learn their studies under trees because this nation do not have superior schools and quality education. Therefore, rich kingdom should provide aid of education and medical services.
To conclude, rich nations should help to the poor countries and give financial aid as well as quality education to youngster to develop their career and nation.
- Although there is lot of translation software available learning a language still could be advantage To what extend do you agree or disagree 56
- Companies should provide sports and social facilities for local communities To what extent do you agree 73
- Rich countries often give financial aid to poor countries but it does not solve poverty So rich countries should give other types of help to poor countries rather than financial aid To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Nowadays celebraties are more famous for their glamour and wealth than for their achievements and this has bad example for young people To what extend do you agree or disagree 56
- The charts give information about two genres of TV programmes watched by men and women and four different age groups in Australia Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevent 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 73, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'become'.
Suggestion: become
... day by day as well as poor nations are became poor. Handful of the people, think deve...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 359, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'has'.
Suggestion: has
... rather than financial aid. This notion have both pros and cons. I would discuss bot...
^^^^
Line 2, column 118, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ive financial aid to poor countries. In this criteria, of developed countries provid...
^^^^
Line 4, column 13, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ion and medical services. To conclude, rich nations should help to the poor cou...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, therefore, well, whereas, for instance, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1551.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25762711864 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59555671864 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.48813559322 0.561755894193 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 473.4 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.4839979515 49.4020404114 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.785714286 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0714285714 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.21428571429 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.487179056705 0.244688304435 199% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.19455216679 0.084324248473 231% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.149822879323 0.0667982634062 224% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.360847979997 0.151304729494 238% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0927424651244 0.056905535591 163% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.