The maps show improvements that have been made to a university campus between 2010 and the present day.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The two maps provide information about developments that have been developed on a university campus during 2010 and the present.
Overall, it is seen clearly from both maps that many new facilities had been constructed in the given period. And a new road was built in place of the restaurant.
To comments with, the building for student accommodation on the northwest side of the map expanded into two buildings for the same usage. Furthermore, university offices and a teaching block from both sides of the main road both had been transformed into the new science and art building respectively. Despite the lawn and seating area around the lake is removed, but the lake remained the same.
Moreover, students facilities and, shops, offices and others had been replaced the old student accommodation place on the right side on the road in the west. In addition, the restaurant and shops on the south side of the campus had been demolished. There were a road and a building for accommodation usage that had been constructed in that place.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-06-11 | kevann | 89 | view |
| 2022-05-22 | kamelelahe | 78 | view |
| 2022-01-30 | trasher kubarev | view | |
| 2021-09-06 | viviene | 78 | view |
| 2021-08-20 | rajpatel90 | 73 | view |
- Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists but not local people Why is it the case What can be done to attract local people to visit these places 78
- The charts below show local government expenditure in 2010 and 2015
- Nowadays sports is a big business with high earnings for professional sports people and companies involved both financially and other ways Is this a positive or negative development for sports 61
- The bar chart below shows employment figures in different tourism related industries between 2009 and 2019 85
- The chart below shows the percentage of overweight men and women in Australia between 1980 and 2010 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 262, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...campus had been demolished, there were a road and a building for accommodation us...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, moreover, so, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 878.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01714285714 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83479258141 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.537142857143 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 267.3 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.2874025611 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.75 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.875 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.23603664747 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142060527969 0.215688989381 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0673125026334 0.103423049105 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0835898284121 0.0843802449381 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110321177021 0.15604864568 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0949624546501 0.0819641961636 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.