The graph below gives information about car ownership in Britain from 1971 to 2007.
The line graph compares the number of cars per household in Great Britain between 1971 and 2007
Overall, it is apparent that the percentage of families owning one car is the biggest through the period. In addition, there was an increase in the proportion of households having two cars while the opposite was true for households without cars.
In 1971, almost half of all British families had no regular use of a car. There was a slightly smaller portion of house owners having one car, with about 44%. Meanwhile, only a few households owned more than one car, with 7% had two cars compared to just around 2% of families falling into the category for three cars or more.
Over the 36-year period, there were significant changes in the proportion of households having no car, which dropped to 25% in 2007. In contrast, the figure for two-car owners witnessed an upward trend, reaching about 26% in 2007. At the same time, the one-car household was the most common type, although its figure nearly stayed the same during the period. Similarly, little change was seen in the percentage of ownership for three or more cars, which only rose to approximately 5%, the lowest proportion among the four type
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-13 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-10-13 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-21 | fdsugb22 | view | |
| 2023-06-14 | hieu13092006 | view | |
| 2022-10-12 | DOT BABA | 78 | view |
- The diagram below shows the manufacturing process for making sugar from sugar cane Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The graph below gives information about car ownership in Britain from 1971 to 2007 85
- The graph below gives information about car ownership in Britain from 1971 to 2007 42
- Online classes make conventional classrooms unnecessary To what extent you agree or disagree 95
- The diagram below shows the process for recycling plastic bottles Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 203, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...wo-car owners witnessed an upward trend, reaching about 26% in 2007. At the same ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, similarly, while, in addition, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 995.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 207.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80676328502 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43542472938 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6038647343 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 297.0 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.9512048058 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.555555556 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.11111111111 5.23603664747 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207974493253 0.215688989381 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0939972606088 0.103423049105 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.059419367344 0.0843802449381 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151514271933 0.15604864568 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0814571345228 0.0819641961636 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.