The table below shows expenditures of four car companies on advertising in the UK in 2002

Essay topics:

The table below shows expenditures of four car companies on advertising in the UK in 2002.

The table provided depicts spending of four car businesses on advertising in the UK in 2002.
Overall, it is evident that Renault spent most money on advertising, and TV advertising was the most popular form of advertising.
As can be seen from the table given, the expenses on TV advertising of four car firms in the UK in 2002 was the largest whereas the opposite was true of that of cinema advertising. Regarding the spending on TV advertising, Cetirizine ranked in the first with about 70 millions of dollars, while Rover standed in the last position with almost 45 millions of dollars. There was not much difference between the expenditures on cinema advertising of Renault and Vauxhall, which was merely 6 and 5 millions of dollars, respectively, whereas the remaining corporations did not spent on this type of advertising.
As far as the table is given, the expenses on press advertising of Renault and Rover was higher compared to other enterprises, which was approximately 45 and 38 millions of dollars, respectively. All four companies spent less than 10 millions of dollars on outdoor advertising and the same amount of money on radio advertising, which was 15 millions of dollars.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2022-04-19 sammixmht10 view
2022-02-20 thanhtam2709 82 view
2021-10-11 haohao 76 view
2021-08-31 Louisa_Nguyễn 67 view
2021-07-13 Tienanh99 73 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The table provided depicts spending of f...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sses on advertising in the UK in 2002. Overall, it is evident that Renault spen...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the most popular form of advertising. As can be seen from the table given, the...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 270, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '70 million'.
Suggestion: 70 million
...tirizine ranked in the first with about 70 millions of dollars, while Rover standed in the las...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 347, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '45 million'.
Suggestion: 45 million
...tanded in the last position with almost 45 millions of dollars. There was not much difference ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 496, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '5 million'.
Suggestion: 5 million
...lt and Vauxhall, which was merely 6 and 5 millions of dollars, respectively, whereas the rema...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 576, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'did' requires the base form of the verb: 'spend'
Suggestion: spend
...reas the remaining corporations did not spent on this type of advertising. As f...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...not spent on this type of advertising. As far as the table is given, the expens...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 164, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '38 million'.
Suggestion: 38 million
...rprises, which was approximately 45 and 38 millions of dollars, respectively. All four compani...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 236, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '10 million'.
Suggestion: 10 million
...ely. All four companies spent less than 10 millions of dollars on outdoor advertising and the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 343, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '15 million'.
Suggestion: 15 million
...f money on radio advertising, which was 15 millions of dollars.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, regarding, whereas, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 998.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01507537688 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06950863914 2.65546596893 116% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.497487437186 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 297.9 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 43.8615632951 43.030603864 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.571428571 112.824112599 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.4285714286 22.9334400587 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.14285714286 5.23603664747 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 11.0 1.69756097561 648% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22679626394 0.215688989381 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.139053339871 0.103423049105 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.140042884325 0.0843802449381 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186599071094 0.15604864568 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.147675434953 0.0819641961636 180% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.2329268293 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.