The pie charts represents the amount of energy produced from five different kinds of energy in France in 1995 and 2005
Overall, the amount of gas and coal generating energy in France increased slightly in both years and accounted higher percentage than the others. It can be seen that the amount of energy generated from gas ,coal ,nuclear ,and other sources of energy increased slightly while energy production from petrol decreased sharply
In 1995 , coal production was the highest ,accounting for 29,80% of total energy production in France. The figure for gas and petrol was slightly lower at 29,63 and 29,27% respectively. Meanwhile ,only 6,40% of total energy production in France was generated by nuclear. The percentage of energy produced from other sources is the lowest at only 2,90%
In 2005 it can be seen that the amount of energy produced for gas and coal was higher than other sources, petrol and nuclear. In 2005 There was a sharp fall in the production of energy by petrol about 10%, while the opposite trend was for gas, coal,nuclear and other sources which went up slightly .
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The maps below show a town centre in 1990 and the same town centre today Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You should write at least 15 78
- The given line graph depicts the rate of visitors in Scotland who had a trip to 4 types of attractions between 1980 and 2010 78
- The pie chart give information about visitors to the US from different countries from 1988 to 1992 79
- The maps below show the future plan about the Biology School in particular university 61
- The diagram below shows how one type of coal is used to produce electricity Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 119, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nds of energy in France in 1995 and 2005 Overall, the amount of gas and coal gene...
^^^
Line 2, column 206, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... the amount of energy generated from gas ,coal ,nuclear ,and other sources of ener...
^^
Line 2, column 212, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...mount of energy generated from gas ,coal ,nuclear ,and other sources of energy inc...
^^
Line 2, column 221, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...energy generated from gas ,coal ,nuclear ,and other sources of energy increased sl...
^^
Line 2, column 323, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...production from petrol decreased sharply In 1995 , coal production was the highes...
^^^
Line 3, column 8, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... from petrol decreased sharply In 1995 , coal production was the highest ,accoun...
^^
Line 3, column 42, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...n 1995 , coal production was the highest ,accounting for 29,80% of total energy pr...
^^
Line 3, column 196, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...29,63 and 29,27% respectively. Meanwhile ,only 6,40% of total energy production in...
^^
Line 4, column 249, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , nuclear
...ile the opposite trend was for gas, coal,nuclear and other sources which went up slightl...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 298, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...and other sources which went up slightly .
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, while, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 916.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97826086957 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50311402773 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 84.0 106.607317073 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.45652173913 0.547539520022 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 268.2 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 78.7049694887 43.030603864 183% => OK
Chars per sentence: 152.666666667 112.824112599 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.6666666667 22.9334400587 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 5.23603664747 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 1.69756097561 589% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257857337637 0.215688989381 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.147133743529 0.103423049105 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103079723188 0.0843802449381 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.212172720566 0.15604864568 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.135027517439 0.0819641961636 165% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.2329268293 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.49 61.2550243902 81% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.2 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.7 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 11.4329268293 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.