The best way to reduce crime among young people is to teach parents good parenting skills.
Do you agree or disagree?
It is often argued that teaching parents good nurturing skills is the most appropriate way to mitigate juvenile crime. This essay completely disagrees with this viewpoint because it will have very little effect on the juvenile crime rate and making strict laws is the best method to reduce crime amongst youngsters.
The primary reason why teaching mother and father good parenting traits does not make sense is that it would decrease a very little crime rate among young people. This is because parents teach their children essential morals and ethics to make them valuable citizens. However, it is the outside environment of their house, which encourages them to commit any crime, such as peer pressure. For example, it is shown in a recent survey by Cambridge University that 25% of youngsters committed crimes by the influence of their peers irrespective of how good they were taught by their parents.
Another reason for mitigating the juvenile crime rate is that the government should make the law against it. This is to say that severe punishments deter the youth from indulging in criminals activities, which could jeopardize their and their family’s lives. This will result in them staying away from any illegal activities and becoming responsible citizens. For instance, the UAE has the lowest crime rate amongst youngsters because the state has strict rules and impose heavy fines against any criminal affairs.
In conclusion, reducing juvenile crime by teaching parents good parenting skills is not a suitable option because this would be less effective to deter young people to commit any crime and strict laws are the only way.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-03 | Chinkiarora | 61 | view |
- Financial education should be a mandatory component of the school program To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 73
- The pie charts below describe average household expenditures by major categories in Japan and Malaysia in 2010
- Some businesses prohibit smoking in any of their offices Some governments have banned smoking in all public places Do you agree or disagree that this is the right course of action Give reasons for your opinion 73
- Nowadays some people claim that public museums and art galleries will not be needed because people can see historical objects and works by using the computer Do you agree or disagree 85
- People living in large cities have to face many problems in everyday life. What are those problems?Should the government encourage people to move to regional towns? 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1386.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 267.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19101123596 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49891614766 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.569288389513 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 423.9 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.9654809732 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.0 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2727272727 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.63636363636 7.06120827912 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.298778688415 0.244688304435 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118459498761 0.084324248473 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.126129943061 0.0667982634062 189% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.220709699751 0.151304729494 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.132612061208 0.056905535591 233% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.