The graph provides the information about the speed of language learning by using different methods like studying 1 to 1, studying in a group at a language school and studying alone without a teacher.
Overall, all methods giving a gradual increase in the learning speed . Compare to all these methods studying 1 to 1 is more efficient. The studying group at language school is more efficient than the studying alone without a teacher.
To begin with, studying 1 to1 method is more efficient than the two other methods. In this system takes around approximately 65 hours to A0 level to B2 level. It was the fastest method of language learning. In addition, the studying in a group at language school is taking more time to take student to achieve upper intermediate level. Around 96 hours took more get higher level. Furthermore , the last method took very long time to get A0 to B2. Around more than 289 hours time take a student to achieve the level Upper intermediate
- the pie charts and table gives information about the total value and sources of fish imported to the US between 1988 and 2000 61
- Big salary is much more important than job satisfaction Do you agree or disagree Provide relevant examples if necessary 56
- The bar chart shows the divorce rates in two European countries from 2011 to 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The table below shows the worldwide market share of the notebook computer market for manufacturers in the years 2006 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The graph below shows relative rates of language acquisition according to different study methods 69
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 146, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tudying 1 to 1, studying in a group at a language school and studying alone witho...
^^
Line 2, column 28, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... a teacher. Overall, all methods giving a gradual increase in the learning speed...
^^
Line 2, column 70, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...a gradual increase in the learning speed . Compare to all these methods studying 1...
^^
Line 3, column 137, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...m takes around approximately 65 hours to A0 level to B2 level. It was the fastest...
^^
Line 3, column 393, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... took more get higher level. Furthermore , the last method took very long time to...
^^
Line 3, column 416, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...evel. Furthermore , the last method took very long time to get A0 to B2. Around m...
^^
Line 3, column 536, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... to achieve the level Upper intermediate
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, in addition, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 804.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 168.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.78571428571 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64140572829 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 81.0 106.607317073 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.482142857143 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 244.8 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.0870801321 43.030603864 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 73.0909090909 112.824112599 65% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.2727272727 22.9334400587 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.90909090909 5.23603664747 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211096610901 0.215688989381 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0929257557526 0.103423049105 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0858595205231 0.0843802449381 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189445342272 0.15604864568 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0861122870879 0.0819641961636 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.8 13.2329268293 67% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.3012195122 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.91 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.11 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.