The table below shows the production of cacao beans in six regions between 1992 and 1998. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The table gives a demonstration of the manufacturing of cocoa beans in six different parts of the world from the year 1992 to 1998.
Overall, what stands out from the graph is that the production in Asia and Oceania had grown over the periods, for the rest of the four the amount fluctuate.
To begin with the increasing trend region, in 1992, from Asia 11900 tons cocoa beans produced which is the second-highest, while 29000 and 40000 ton came from Africa, and Oceania respectively. In the case of Oceania, it increased gradually and in 1998, it manufactured 76890 tons. Turning to the other twos the production rose rapidly, in Asia within 4 years the manufacture went from 124000 to 436000, whereas in Africa the production climbed up to 1996 at 199000 but in the next period the crashed down to 25000 tons.
In addition, the beginning and ending value of North and Central America was the same which is 46000 tons. England minimum production 43000 and maximum 67000 tons, over the periods the value fluctuates between these number. From the beginning production of 143000 tons, the value started to drift off for the next four years to 112700 tons then it suddenly rose to 389000 tons and it was the highest production in 1998 among the six reasons.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-08 | Sanaullah97 | 92 | view |
| 2021-08-23 | Lâm Yên Chi | 67 | view |
- Some people think that students in single sex schools perform better academically Others however believe that mixed schools provide children with better social skills for adult life Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 73
- International student enrolment in British universities 2009 2014 78
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes in billions of telephone calls in the UK divided into three categories from 1995 2002 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- Nowadays more people are choosing to socialise online rather than face to face Is this a positive or negative development 84
- The graph below shows waste recycling rates in the U S from 1960 to 2011 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, second, so, then, whereas, while, in addition, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1046.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 218.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79816513761 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84250218741 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53743954499 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56880733945 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 282.6 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.5097078229 43.030603864 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.75 112.824112599 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.25 22.9334400587 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.625 5.23603664747 165% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.131795756736 0.215688989381 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0622186549559 0.103423049105 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0486061318491 0.0843802449381 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0904598370761 0.15604864568 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0526465823004 0.0819641961636 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.2329268293 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 69.45 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.