The diagram illustrates the changes in the structural design of a science park between 2008 and the present time.
Overall, what stands out from the picture is that as the present outlook, the southern and the northern part has decorated with the new and expanded buildings.
To begin, northwest grassland is replaced with a research and development center. Next to it, a university hub is made by replacing the reception and the office is situated in the same place. In addition, in the northeast corner cycle path is made alongside the road. Moreover, business units and the car park are in the right position but the space of the car park is reduced and shape like a square which in the past like a rectangular.
Furthermore, a cycle path is added with every road except the curve road in the east, additionally, the station is removed from the railway track, and the; IT center is turned into an innovation center. According to the past diagram, the cyber security center was in a square shape but at present, it is bigger than the previous and the shape is now like L. Between the innovation and cyber security center there is a path that connects the three places.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 425, Rule ID: DT_JJ_NO_NOUN[1]
Message: Probably a noun is missing in this part of the sentence.
...pe like a square which in the past like a rectangular. Furthermore, a cycle path is added ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 152, Rule ID: THE_PUNCT[1]
Message: Did you forget something after 'the'?
... is removed from the railway track, and the; IT center is turned into an innovation ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 160, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'centers'?
Suggestion: centers
...ved from the railway track, and the; IT center is turned into an innovation center. Ac...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, look, moreover, so, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 976.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 206.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73786407767 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78849575616 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57466502493 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.54854368932 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 299.7 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.4990703451 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.444444444 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8888888889 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.44444444444 5.23603664747 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0765218505656 0.215688989381 35% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0319949131614 0.103423049105 31% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0533803643037 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.058917070884 0.15604864568 38% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0643809208675 0.0819641961636 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.51 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.