Why do you think some people are attracted to dangerous sports or other dangerous activities? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
I think there are many reasons for some people to be attracted to dangerous activities. I will be discussing some reasons in the following paragraphs.
First of all, I think that those who are usually attracted to dangerous sports, for example, mount climbing, like to take up challenges in general. The dangerous sports are a big challenge in themselves. They demand a lot of patience, boldness, and physical strength to accomplish them. Sounds very challenging right? So, these sports are likely to attract those who welcome challenges with an open arm. Mountain climbing is a difficult task. No matter the precautions you take, there is a chance that you can get into trouble or even worse, you can die. Hence, it is only for those, who, despite knowing all the consequences are willing to give it a shot.
Furthermore, some people like these dangerous sports or activities because they might simply find them interesting for some personal reason of their own. Personal reasons could mean many things. I would like to speak from my own personal experience, I find scuba diving interesting and I always wanted to try it because I like marine biology and I love to observe fishes and other aquatic animals. Scuba diving is a dangerous sport. There have been incidents of attack by sharks but, despite its dangers, I am attracted to it because of my love for marine biology. Another person might be attracted to scuba diving because that is the only dangerous sport he has heard about. Some others might be attracted to it because they want to overcome their fears such as fear of the dark.
Lastly, people can be attracted to a dangerous activity for no particular reason, and it is just that they like it and want to try it. There are many things which we are attracted to for no reason. This can also be applied in the case of dangerous activities as well. People might not have reason to like ski diving or any other dangerous sport.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-05 | theprasad | 70 | view |
| 2023-03-02 | Alina_irfan | 70 | view |
| 2021-12-24 | AlexanderProust | 85 | view |
| 2021-09-15 | maryam15 | 60 | view |
| 2021-09-15 | maryam15 | 60 | view |
- Directions For this task you will read a passage about an academic topic and you will listen to a lecture about the same topic You may take notes while you read and listen Then you will write a response to a question that asks you about the relationship b 3
- Directions Give yourself 20 minutes to plan and write your response Your response is judged on the quality of the writing and on how well it presents the points in the lecture and their relationship to the reading passage Typically an effective response w 3
- Writing Practice Set 1 Integrated Passage Lecture and Question Directions Give yourself 3 minutes to read the passage Reading Time 3 minutes In an effort to encourage ecologically sustainable forestry practices an international organization started issuin 7
- Many lives might be saved if inoculations against cow flu were routinely administered to all people in areas where the disease is detected However since there is a small possibility that a person will die as a result of the inoculations we cannot permit i 50
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Our current way of life will have a negative impact on future generations 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, hence, if, lastly, so, well, for example, i think, in general, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 52.1666666667 82% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1613.0 1977.66487455 82% => OK
No of words: 338.0 407.700716846 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.77218934911 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28774723029 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5843241838 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 212.727598566 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.514792899408 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 510.3 618.680645161 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.6166042152 48.9658058833 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 76.8095238095 100.406767564 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0952380952 20.6045352989 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.47619047619 5.45110844103 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.312907071794 0.236089414692 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107918278582 0.076458572812 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0911657446104 0.0737576698707 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.222208877134 0.150856017488 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0594682407427 0.0645574589148 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.1 11.7677419355 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.1575268817 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.09 10.9000537634 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.05 8.01818996416 88% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 86.8835125448 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 4.5 10.002688172 45% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.