The charts below give information on the amount of various fruits which was consumed in a South American country between 1969 and the present.
The line chart illustrates the information about consumption of bananas, apples, oranges, and pears in south American from 1969 to 2019.
Overall, it can be seen that the consumption of apples was the highest initially ,whereas banana consumption increased in the end of the period. Further, the consumption of apples, oranges, pears decreased, while only the bananas consumption increased over a period .
Looking at the apple line in more detail, it can be seen that the amount of apple which were consumed in 1969 stood at 7.1 Kilograms per person per year, the it was peak at about 8.4 Kilograms per person per year in 1979, which was the greatest point in the graph. By 2019 it had decreased to approximately 4.1 Kilograms per person per year.
Turning to the bananas data set, the consumption of bananas stood at 5 Kilograms per person per year in 1969 , it increased exponentially where it was peak at 7.1 and 8.23 Kilograms per person per year in 2009 and 2019 respectively.
Consumption of oranges was the same as that of bananas in 1969,at 5 Kilograms per person per year. The amount of oranges which were consumed continuously fell to 3 Kilograms per person per year in the end of the period.
Finally, the consumption of pears was consistently lowest over the period. In the beginning of the period, it was started at 3 kg/p/y and steadily dropped to about 2.19 in the current year
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-20 | kiran sanghera | 67 | view |
- The charts below give Information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy In 2000 and projections for 2050 69
- People who decide on a career path early in their lives and keep to it are more likely to have a satisfying working life than those who change jobs frequently To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- The charts below give Information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy In 2000 and projections for 2050 67
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 81
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 81, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...tion of apples was the highest initially ,whereas banana consumption increased in ...
^^
Line 2, column 256, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y the bananas consumption increased over a period . Looking at the apple line in...
^^
Line 2, column 266, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...nas consumption increased over a period . Looking at the apple line in more deta...
^^
Line 3, column 155, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'it'?
Suggestion: the; it
...d at 7.1 Kilograms per person per year, the it was peak at about 8.4 Kilograms per per...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 69, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...set, the consumption of bananas stood at 5 Kilograms per person per year in 1969 ...
^^
Line 4, column 110, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... 5 Kilograms per person per year in 1969 , it increased exponentially where it was...
^^
Line 4, column 160, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eased exponentially where it was peak at 7.1 and 8.23 Kilograms per person per y...
^^
Line 4, column 169, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...onentially where it was peak at 7.1 and 8.23 Kilograms per person per year in 20...
^^
Line 4, column 222, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ams per person per year in 2009 and 2019 respectively. Consumption of oranges wa...
^^
Line 6, column 39, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'consistently the lowest'.
Suggestion: consistently the lowest
... Finally, the consumption of pears was consistently lowest over the period. In the beginning of t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 134, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f the period, it was started at 3 kg/p/y and steadily dropped to about 2.19 in t...
^^
Line 6, column 148, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...it was started at 3 kg/p/y and steadily dropped to about 2.19 in the current yea...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, look, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1158.0 965.302439024 120% => OK
No of words: 241.0 196.424390244 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80497925311 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76471551562 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.419087136929 0.547539520022 77% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 333.9 283.868780488 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.1118956613 43.030603864 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.8 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.3 5.23603664747 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 3.83414634146 156% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 12.0 1.69756097561 707% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.123871033279 0.215688989381 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0647624826339 0.103423049105 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0575435224606 0.0843802449381 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0842565710744 0.15604864568 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0577733341204 0.0819641961636 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.38 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.