Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage.
The reading passage talks about the benefits of autonomous cars. The lecturer does not agree with these benefits for various reasons which I will explore in the following paragraphs.
First, the passage suggests that driverless cars cause less accidents than cars driven by a human driver. The professor does not agree with it and says that the automated cars are programmed by humans. So, it is bound to have some errors. To corroborate his statement, the professor gave the example of an accident of a self-driving car which has driven over 700,000 miles.
Furthermore, the reading passage cites that self-driven cars cause less environmental pollution because of their ability to communicate with other cars and reduce traffic.So, the cars will stop and start the engine less often. Thus, reducing pollution. Again, the professor finds this benefit flawed and says that automated cars will in fact, cause more pollution as people will not need to have a license to drive a car, this way everyone including the young and the old might get cars. Thus, increasing the number of cars on the road and leading to more traffic and pollution.
Lastly, the passage mentions that self-driven might give time to the passengers to do other work or watch videos. The professor finds this statement flawed and says that some people find driving relaxing. It might give them a time off from their route work life and because of the autonomous cars, they will again do their route work which they do all day or probably waste time and watch videos.
Thus, the lecturer disagrees with the advantages of automated cars mentioned in the reading passage.
- Summarise the points made in the lecture you just heard explaining how it casts doubt on the points made in the reading 3
- People work because they need money to live What are some other reasons that people work Discuss one or more of these reasons Use specific examples and details to support your answer 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Television advertising directed toward young children aged two to five should not be allowed 66
- Claim In any situation the best way to persuade other people is to present them with facts and statistics rather than with emotional arguments Reason Facts are objective so they are more persuasive than subjective appeals Write a response in which you dis 50
- abc 16
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 56, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun accidents is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...age suggests that driverless cars cause less accidents than cars driven by a human d...
^^^^
Line 3, column 320, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sor gave the example of an accident of a self-driving car which has driven over ...
^^
Line 3, column 338, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...le of an accident of a self-driving car which has driven over 700,000 miles. ...
^^
Line 5, column 172, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: So
...cate with other cars and reduce traffic.So, the cars will stop and start the engi...
^^
Line 5, column 189, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ars and reduce traffic.So, the cars will stop and start the engine less often. Th...
^^
Line 5, column 432, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... have a license to drive a car, this way everyone including the young and the old...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, lastly, so, thus, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 10.4613686534 19% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 7.30242825607 164% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1378.0 1373.03311258 100% => OK
No of words: 274.0 270.72406181 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02919708029 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52117675897 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.518248175182 0.540411800872 96% => OK
syllable_count: 413.1 419.366225166 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.9871180777 49.2860985944 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.4285714286 110.228320801 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5714285714 21.698381199 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 7.06452816374 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0575355561798 0.272083759551 21% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0242856086749 0.0996497079465 24% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.029758200191 0.0662205650399 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0452844427636 0.162205337803 28% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0267256367009 0.0443174109184 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.3589403974 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.2367328918 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.75 8.42419426049 92% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 63.6247240618 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.