The table below shows the production of carbon dioxide in five different countries in 2006. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The table illustrates that the amount of carbon dioxide is manufactured in different nations, namely China, the USA, Russia, India, and Japan between 2005 and 2006.
Overall, it can be seen that China was the highest-ranked within the total tons of CO2 production, while the USA witnessed a slight decline than the left nations in the given time.
It is manifest from the table that the developed countries had released into emissions CO2 was fairly high. What is it meant that is in the USA reached a peak at 19.8 per person in the tons of CO2. The second-ranked is belonging to Russia with 12.1 per person, which was followed by Japan and China with figures of 9.8 and 4.6, respectively. Meanwhile, India was a country that produced at least CO2 per person, at 1.4.
Concerning the total tons of CO2 production, initially, The USA are higher than the rest of other countries, however, it saw a significant soar by 339 million tons in 2006. In contrast, China had superseded the USA in CO2 emissions, with it went up to 11 per cent in 2006. On the other hand, Russia, India, Japan had an inconsiderable rise of 0.6%, 8%, 1.1% from 2005 to 2006.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-23 | TranMinhDuc | 74 | view |
- Percentage of UK people who consumed daily recommended amount of fruit and vegetable in 2002 2006 and 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The first chart below shows the percentages of women and men in a country involved in some kinds of home tasks cooking cleaning pet caring and repairing the house The second chart shows the amount of time each gender spent on each task per day Summarize t 62
- Get rid of old things to get the newest fashion and the latest technology Do the disadvantages of a throwaway society outweigh the advantages 11
- The graph below shows the information about medical care in three Europe countries between 1980 and 2000 81
- The diagram below shows the manufacturing process for making sugar from sugar cane 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 216, Rule ID: NON_ACTION_CONTINUOUS[3]
Message: The verb belong is usually not used with a continuous form, use the simple form instead. Suggestion: 'belongs'
Suggestion: belongs
...n in the tons of CO2. The second-ranked is belonging to Russia with 12.1 per person, which w...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 216, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...n in the tons of CO2. The second-ranked is belonging to Russia with 12.1 per person, which w...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, second, so, while, at least, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 947.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 204.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.64215686275 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6833164979 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558823529412 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 276.3 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.4951454023 43.030603864 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.375 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 5.23603664747 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0787265696275 0.215688989381 37% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0411575496352 0.103423049105 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0496227168048 0.0843802449381 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0605637540505 0.15604864568 39% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.059167085281 0.0819641961636 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.93 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.