Recently, there is a ton of debate about genetically modified trees and their costs and benefits. More specifically, regarding the passage, the author puts forth the idea that planting genetically modified trees on a large scale promises to bring a number of benefits and he provides three reasons of support. However, the professor explains that planting these kinds of trees on a large scale has more costs and less positive points and addresses, in detail, the trouble of each point made by the passage.
First, the passage claims that genetically modified trees are designed to be hardier than natural trees and they are more likely to survive than their unmodified counterparts. Some professionals in the same field stand in firm opposition to this claim. The professor, for example, believes that they may be resistant to one type of situation but we can't be sure that they are resistant to some other kinds of events and conditions. He states that for several natural trees, some individual trees in a kind are resistant to some conditions and some are not. Therefore, after experiencing that condition, a few of them will survive. But the problem with genetically altered trees is that they are much more uniform and if they go through a situation, for example, climate change, they will all die with that change.
Second, the reading posits that genetically modified trees tend to grow faster, give greater yields, and be hardier and it will benefit farmers more than natural trees. However, the professor says that planting those trees has some hidden costs. Companies that sell the seeds charge much for each seed and after one period of yielding, farmers will not be able to use the seeds produced from the trees to plant them again. Instead, they have to pay companies every time.
Finally, the writer wraps this argument by proposing that the use of genetically modified trees can prevent overexploitation of wild trees. It contends that introducing genetically modified trees which are designed for fast growth and high yield would satisfy the demand for wood in many areas and save the endangered native trees. The professor opposes this point by explaining that genetically modified trees deal more damage and grow more aggressively. According to the professor, compared to natural trees, they are more competent and in contention for minerals and water, they will win significantly, and eventually, this will result in crowding out natural trees.
To sum up, both the writer and the professor hold conflicting views about if planting genetically modified trees is beneficial.
- TPO-48 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Because modern life is very complex, it is essential for young people to have the ability to plan and organize. 63
- TPO 24 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement One of the best ways that parents can help their teenage children prepare for adult life is to encourage them to take a part time job Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- TPO-40 - Integrated Writing Task Many scientists believe it would be possible to maintain a permanent human presence on Mars or the Moon. On the other hand, conditions on Venus are so extreme and inhospitable that maintaining a human presence there would 76
- Animal fossils usually provide very little opportunity to study the actual animal tissues because in fossils the animals living tissues have been largely replaced by minerals Thus scientists were very excited recently when it appeared that a 70 million ye 3
- tpo 24 the T rex fossil still had actual tissue 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 350, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...sistant to one type of situation but we cant be sure that they are resistant to some...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, may, regarding, second, so, therefore, for example, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.4613686534 153% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 7.30242825607 288% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 22.412803532 174% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 30.3222958057 158% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2182.0 1373.03311258 159% => OK
No of words: 424.0 270.72406181 157% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14622641509 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53775939005 4.04702891845 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68951906778 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 145.348785872 144% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.495283018868 0.540411800872 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 668.7 419.366225166 159% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.7519992916 49.2860985944 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.222222222 110.228320801 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5555555556 21.698381199 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.27777777778 7.06452816374 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 4.33554083885 208% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0559837624823 0.272083759551 21% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0234659738784 0.0996497079465 24% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0242326608265 0.0662205650399 37% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0405042412407 0.162205337803 25% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0130427710557 0.0443174109184 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.3589403974 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 53.8541721854 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 12.2367328918 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 63.6247240618 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.