Online classes make conventional classrooms unnecessary. To what extent you agree or disagree?
There is a topic of interest that whether traditional classes can be dispensed by e-learning in the modern day. While virtual classes have certain benefits, I believe that physical classrooms are unreplaceable.
On the one hand, there are some compelling reasons for the rapid growth of web-based classrooms. Firstly, it is more cost-efficient to learn on the Internet. Students can have access to various online courses with low tuition or even join lessons in live streams on social media platforms like Facebook and Youtube without fees. Secondly, a virtual environment help overcomes time constraints and geographical boundaries. As people can choose lessons that suit their schedule, they can actively manage their time to work more effectively. Moreover, online learning connects tutors and learners worldwide, irrespective of their nations or locations; therefore, it affords people in remote areas to enrich their knowledge and improve their lives.
On the other hand, despite some mentioned benefits, I contend that the conventional learning model is not expendable. One of the reasons is simply that some fields require physical interaction. Especially in subjects that require elaborate lab setup and equipment like chemistry, physics, and biology, it is impossible to learn in the comfort of one’s home. Furthermore, the classroom dynamic is often scarce in online classrooms. There is a lack of two-way interaction due to the loss of the Internet connection, students’ distractions, and many other factors that reduce academic performance. In contrast, being taught face to face provides learners with opportunities to hone their skills through live discussions, team-working activities, which e-learning can hardly emulate.
In conclusion, although virtual classes are beneficial to a certain extent, I think that brick-and-mortar operation still plays an important role in education and, thus, should not be eliminated.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-21 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-18 | Thai Tran | 84 | view |
- Fossil fuel is the main source of energy In some countries the use of alternative sources of energy is encouraged Is this a positive or negative development 78
- Fossil fuel is the main source of energy In some countries the use of alternative sources of energy is encouraged Is this a positive or negative development 78
- The diagram shows the life cycle of a honey bee
- People in many countries are spending less time with their family What are the reasons and effects of it 78
- The chart shows the percentage of women and men in one Asian country who passed when they took their driving test between 1980 and 2010
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 673, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to people'
Suggestion: to people
...ons or locations; therefore, it affords people in remote areas to enrich their knowled...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, thus, while, as to, i think, in conclusion, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1655.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.70689655172 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11034482759 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.631034482759 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 504.9 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.4750351144 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.333333333 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3333333333 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2 7.06120827912 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0914568940871 0.244688304435 37% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0310636758624 0.084324248473 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0411515556928 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0635648844603 0.151304729494 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0285521931032 0.056905535591 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.84 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.35 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.