Task 1: The line graph below gives information about the percentage of women aged 15-64 in employment between 2003 and 2009.
The line chart illustrates the proportion of women aged 15-64 in employment during the period of 6 years from 2003 to 2009 in 5 nations, namely: Iceland, Canada, Germany, Chile, Turkey.
As an overall trend, it is immediately that while employment level of women in this group of all countries witnessed a downward trend, except for the figure for Iceland and Chile. Noticeably, the proportion of women aged 15-64 in the employment of Iceland are by far the most popular among the other countries.
As regards Iceland’s women aged 15-64 in employment rate from 2005 onwards, having stagnation at 80% of females aged 15-64 had jobs opposed to merely under 70% for Canadian, followed by the figure for Germany was low at 60%. The reverse occurred with respect to the figure for Chile and Turkey, the percentage of employed females Chile was an escalated markedly by 10% from 2003 to 2005, the opposite was true for the figure for Turkey was declined gradually.
Over subsequent 4 years, the number of all nations namely Canada, Germany, Chile, Turkey which is witnessed a marked escalation of approximately 1% to 5%, except for Iceland was reached around 82%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-01 | bepmy2992004 | 78 | view |
| 2020-02-25 | Nguyen Manh Dung | 78 | view |
| 2020-02-25 | Nguyen Manh Dung | 85 | view |
| 2019-01-30 | Tieuquyen_HCY | 84 | view |
- The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework in households in one country between 1920 and 2019 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons 78
- The first graph shows the number of train passengers from 2000 to 2009 the second compares the percentage of trains running on time and target in the period
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010 67
- It is said that new parents should attend parenting courses to make sure how to know raise a kid successfully To what extent do you agree or disagree with the opinion 61
- The chart below shows what Anthropology graduates from one university did after finishing their undergraduate degree course The table shows the salaries of the anthropologists in work after five years 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
while, as regards, except for, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 976.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00512820513 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6332521896 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584615384615 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 292.5 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 22.4926829268 142% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 34.1731701128 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 162.666666667 112.824112599 144% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.5 22.9334400587 142% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.66666666667 5.23603664747 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210107858432 0.215688989381 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127902521572 0.103423049105 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0969577263272 0.0843802449381 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143817083322 0.15604864568 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0973284514732 0.0819641961636 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.4 13.2329268293 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.46 61.2550243902 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.3012195122 142% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.37 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.43 8.06136585366 117% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.9970731707 135% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.