Task 1: The line graph below gives information about the percentage of women aged 15-64 in employment between 2003 and 2009.
The line chart illustrates the proportion of women aged 15-64 in employment during the period of 6 years from 2003 to 2009 in 5 nations, namely: Iceland, Canada, Germany, Chile, Turkey.
As an overall trend, it is immediately that while employment level of women in this group of all countries witnessed a downward trend, except for the figure for Iceland and Chile. Noticeably, the proportion of women aged 15-64 in the employment of Iceland are by far the most popular among the other countries.
As regards Iceland’s women aged 15-64 in employment rate from 2005 onwards, having stagnation at 80% of females aged 15-64 had jobs opposed to merely under 70% for Canadian, followed by the figure for Germany was low at 60%. The reverse occurred with respect to the figure for Chile and Turkey, the percentage of employed females Chile was an escalated markedly by 10% from 2003 to 2005, the opposite was true for the figure for Turkey was declined gradually.
Over subsequent 4 years, the number of all nations namely Canada, Germany, Chile, Turkey which is witnessed a marked escalation of approximately 1% to 5%, except for Iceland was reached around 82%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-01 | bepmy2992004 | 78 | view |
| 2020-02-25 | Nguyen Manh Dung | 78 | view |
| 2020-02-25 | Nguyen Manh Dung | 85 | view |
| 2019-01-30 | Tieuquyen_HCY | 84 | view |
- The maps below show changes in the Spanish city of Castell n in recent times Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- Online classes make conventional classes unnecessary To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- The maps below show changes in the Spanish city of Castell n in recent times Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- Some people say that protecting the environment is the government s responsibility Others believe that every individiual should be responsible for it Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- The pictures below show how tea is produced They also illustrate the process of making a cup of tea Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features 87
Transition Words or Phrases used:
while, as regards, except for, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 976.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00512820513 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6332521896 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584615384615 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 292.5 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 22.4926829268 142% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 34.1731701128 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 162.666666667 112.824112599 144% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.5 22.9334400587 142% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.66666666667 5.23603664747 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210107858432 0.215688989381 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127902521572 0.103423049105 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0969577263272 0.0843802449381 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143817083322 0.15604864568 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0973284514732 0.0819641961636 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.4 13.2329268293 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.46 61.2550243902 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.3012195122 142% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.37 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.43 8.06136585366 117% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.9970731707 135% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.