The graphs illustrate the amount of energy consumed by Australian household and their impacts to the environment in term of created greenhouse gas emissions.
There are 6 elements to compare. The most common source used is heating with 42% and the least one is cooling with just a minor rate of 2%. It can also be seen that water heating occupies 30% in total of energy use, which is the second well-known consumable source. The rest are refrigeration, lighting and other applications with 7%, 4% and 15%, respectively.
Meanwhile, the second chart shows some similarities and differences about the figures. Despite the spreading of heating in many Australian families, it does not affect to the greenhouse gas emissions as much as water heating ( by 15% that is less than 32%). Besides, other applications also takes huge ratio of 28%. The unchanged factor is cooling with still smallest number of 3%.
In conclusion, heating seems to be the most effecient source of energy due to its high popularity and low environmentary impact to the citizens in this nation.
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now and plans for its development Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The bar chart below shows the average Australian water consumption in selected cities for last year The pie chart shows the distribution of Australian water consumption for last year Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features a 89
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture many people around the world still go hungry Why is this the cases What can be done this problem 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 224, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e gas emissions as much as water heating by 15% that is less than 32%. Besides, o...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, if, second, so, still, well, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 887.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01129943503 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88372562354 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.638418079096 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 267.3 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.3902016215 43.030603864 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.7 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4 5.23603664747 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194476911507 0.215688989381 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0617796767442 0.103423049105 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0609647175689 0.0843802449381 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107963298545 0.15604864568 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0313692659129 0.0819641961636 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.2329268293 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.48 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.