The increase in automation will lead to people losing their jobs.
I agree with the statement and I believe that automation will lead to people losing their jobs. I believe it because of two main reasons. First, because of the scientific advance and development the world has been having?¿ in the last twenty years. Nowadays, we live in the era of most technological and scientific evolution, which has a big impact on the way we live. For example, twenty years ago people wouldn't imagine that we couldn't leave without a cellphone or that the fall of Facebook and other apps will have the impact that had last monday. These changes are also happening in jobs and scientifics are developing machines that can make some mechanical works that years ago were made by people. Studies show us that today 29% of manual jobs are being done by machines and they expect that in five years the porcentaje will grow to 54%, which will affect millions of jobs that used to be done by humans. The second reason, which has a big relation with the evolution and development of new technology and the use of machines to do some works that were explain in the first argument, is the new technology that will aloud the machines not to do only mechanic work, but also somo routinary office work, as data analysis or accounting. This new evolution will result in the loss of more jobs that we didn't expect to be done by machines and demonstrate that we don't know today how much this automation will increase and the limits of it. I believe that these technological advances are really useful but I also think that we should consider when it could be a problem and when people should be prioritized above productivity.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-19 | Barry Shi | 66 | view |
| 2024-08-19 | Barry Shi | 60 | view |
| 2021-11-23 | sanket_chaudhary | 88 | view |
| 2021-11-16 | me2mahesh114 | 73 | view |
| 2021-11-16 | me2mahesh114 | 63 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 407, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...e. For example, twenty years ago people wouldnt imagine that we couldnt leave without a...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 431, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...ears ago people wouldnt imagine that we couldnt leave without a cellphone or that the f...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 1061, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'explained'.
Suggestion: explained
... of machines to do some works that were explain in the first argument, is the new techn...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 1306, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...result in the loss of more jobs that we didnt expect to be done by machines and demon...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 1366, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...one by machines and demonstrate that we dont know today how much this automation wil...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, really, second, so, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 11.0286738351 181% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 52.1666666667 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1342.0 1977.66487455 68% => OK
No of words: 289.0 407.700716846 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.64359861592 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.48103885553 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5234475905 2.67179642975 94% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 212.727598566 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.529411764706 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 427.5 618.680645161 69% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 20.6003584229 49% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.1344086022 139% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 74.6263358339 48.9658058833 152% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.2 100.406767564 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.9 20.6045352989 140% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.3 5.45110844103 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 4.53405017921 22% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 11.8709677419 8% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249226793462 0.236089414692 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0991462008053 0.076458572812 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.139614467798 0.0737576698707 189% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.249226793462 0.150856017488 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0645574589148 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 11.7677419355 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 58.1214874552 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.1575268817 128% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.22 10.9000537634 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.81 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 86.8835125448 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.0537634409 131% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.