In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast train between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport.
In some nations, people have different views when it comes to choosing which type of infrastructure to invest in. While the idea of upgrading public transportation has numerous supporters, I strongly believe that spending the budget on railway lines for high-speed trains is significantly more beneficial.
There are justifiable reasons why some people favor the upgradation of public transport. The first cause is that it could immediately mitigate the traffic jams problem, especially in overcrowded cities. When the public traveling system was more convenient, citizens would be inclined to use this service more, thus reducing the usage of private vehicles - the main culprit of traffic jams. Furthermore, the quality of the atmosphere would be likely to improve. This is because if the volume of vehicles functioning on the street declined, there would be less greenhouse gases emitted to the environment. As a result, the air would be more fresh and healthy to live in.
On the other hand, I would argue that the advantages of speedy trains connecting cities are remarkable for the regional economy and people living in these urban zones. High-speed transportation means that the speed of delivering goods and input materials from one place to another would be significantly faster, thereby increasing the trade volume and the rate of economic development. Moreover, people living in these areas could access a much larger range of occupations, since now they are not limited by geographical boundaries anymore. Therefore, they could have better chances to earn a more lucrative income.
To conclude, while it is true that upgrading public transport may bring certain benefits for tackling traffic jams and air pollution, I believe the advantages of investing in the intercity railway system for speedy trains are much more considerable.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-07 | overviewer2k | 78 | view |
- School should not force children to learn a foreign language To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- In a number of countries some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast train between cities Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport 78
- In a number of countries some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing railway lines for very fast trains between cities Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport Discuss both these vi 78
- School should not force children to learn a foreign language To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- In a number of countries some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast train between cities Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, thus, while, as a result, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1565.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41522491349 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9477192457 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595155709343 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 492.3 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.2746936486 49.4020404114 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.384615385 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2307692308 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.38461538462 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180438588437 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0626206708725 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0583388873641 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119856555323 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0396793636294 0.056905535591 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.59 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.