The graph shows the information about the UK birth rates for women from 1973 to 2008.
The line graph given provides a comparison of the number of births given by Britain women in different age groups in a 35-year period since 1973
From an overall perspective, it is evident that the rate of births given by women aged from 30 to 39 showed an upward trend, whereas a reverse pattern could be observed in the others over the year shown
At the beginning of the period covered by the graph, the number of births given by the 25-29 age group ranked the first, at almost 140 births per 1000 people. Those from 20 to 25 and the 30-35 age group were lower, at just over 120 and under 80 respectively. Twice as many births were given as under 20 and 35-39-year-old women, at 60 compared with 40. However, the figures for the over 40-year-olds accounted for the lowest, at nearly 20 births
In the period from 1988 to 2008, there was a significant decrease in the birth rate of the under 20, 20 to 25 and over 40 age group, at 40, under 100 and 10 respectively. Having fluctuated around 130 births, the proportion of births given by the 25-to-29-year-old then ended at 120 births. A similar amount of the birth rate of the 30-35 and 35-39 age groups was witnessed. Another interesting point is that the figures for the 35-39-year-olds surpassed the under 20 age group and then finished at over 60 births
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 204, Rule ID: WERE_VBB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'where' or 'we'?
Suggestion: where; we
...e from 20 to 25 and the 30-35 age group were lower, at just over 120 and under 80 re...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, so, then, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1083.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 238.0 196.424390244 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.55042016807 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92775363542 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64534091247 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.508403361345 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 299.7 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 34.0 22.4926829268 151% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 144.62957611 43.030603864 336% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 154.714285714 112.824112599 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 34.0 22.9334400587 148% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.28571428571 5.23603664747 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209831469398 0.215688989381 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0979563001594 0.103423049105 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0645968569537 0.0843802449381 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151212489185 0.15604864568 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0231923424853 0.0819641961636 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.2329268293 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.35 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.7 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 26.0 11.4329268293 227% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 15.6 10.9970731707 142% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.