In the future, it seems more difficult to live on Earth. Some people think more money should be spent researching other planets, such as Mars. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
In the upcoming years, it is predictable that people have to cope with more and more hurdles in order to sustain their lives on Earth. As a result, many governments are encouraged to invest more in astrological research to find out an alternative planet for humans. However, personally, I partly agree with this viewpoint because of the following reasons
On the one hand, it is apparent that life on Earth will be much more difficult in the near future owing to two main aspects. First of all, as the population has risen at an unprecedented rate as well as the increase in territory for human cultivation and habitation, it is possible that the future generation may not find enough space to live. In addition, a host of natural resources is also running up, leading to the disappearance of many fossil fuels such as coal, gas, … Consequently, many factors that ensure human’s well-being may have to come to an end, which is impossible for people to continue living on this planet
On the other hand, although it is inhuman if no consideration is taken into maintaining human life on Earth, it is still immensely wasteful and unnecessary if authorities pour money down the drain just for the seek of an alternative planet. In detail, space exploration demands a huge amount of money while there is no high guarantee of success. Moreover, there are multiple countries in the world that are greatly in need of financial support. Therefore, authorities should focus more on urgent situations rather than astrology
To conclude, universal science has always been a topic of interest as the Earth is getting more and more extreme. From my perspective, I endorse the view that research on the universe should not receive so much attention and money as there are still many issues that need immediate support
- The diagram below shows the process for recycling plastic bottles Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant The diagram illustrates how plastic bottles are recycled Overall the recycling of 61
- Information technology enables many people to do their work outside their workplace e g at home when travelling etc Do the benefits of this mobility outweigh the disadvantages 73
- The maps below show the changes that have taken place at the waterfront area of a town called Darwin between 2009 and 2014 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- The chart below shows the places visited by different people living in Canada Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Some people think that governments should ban dangerous sports while others think people should have freedom to do any sports and activity Discuss both view and give your opinion 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 627, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...people to continue living on this planet On the other hand, although it is inhuma...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, however, if, may, moreover, so, still, therefore, well, while, in addition, such as, as a result, as well as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1512.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92508143322 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81372897383 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589576547231 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 486.0 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 34.0 20.2975951904 168% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 124.855274243 49.4020404114 253% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 168.0 106.682146367 157% => OK
Words per sentence: 34.1111111111 20.7667163134 164% => OK
Discourse Markers: 18.6666666667 7.06120827912 264% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.289282451581 0.244688304435 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104884180765 0.084324248473 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0728877444057 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164578282966 0.151304729494 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0536240983349 0.056905535591 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.8 13.0946893788 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.97 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 11.3001002004 147% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.91 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.33 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.6 10.1190380762 154% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.