The given pie charts compare 5 different types of energy generated in France between 1995 and 2005.
Overall, it can be seen that gas, coal and petrol were produced with the largest proportions in France in two examined years. Furthermore, the production of petrol had a tendency to dramatic decrease, whereas the trend was reversed in other kinds of energy.
According to the pie charts, the French produced the huge percentage of coal in 1995, even standing at the first place with 29.80% of the total energy production. Over a period of a decade, there was a slight increase in the proportion of coal generated, reaching a peak at 30.93%. Meanwhile, in the year 2005 also witnessed a relative growth in the figure of gas, from 29,63% to 30.31% of the total. In contrast, while the majority of energy production rose after 10 years, the opposite was true for petrol. 29.27% was the percentage of petrol produced in 1995, this figure tended to significantly decline by nearly 10%, only accounting for 19.55% at the end of the period.
Furthermore, it is obvious that the proportion of nuclear and other types of energy were only responsible for small fractions in 1995 and 2005. Despite the growth in terms of proportion, the figures for nuclear production were only 6.4% and 10.10% respectively. Similarly, 4.9% and 9.10% were the percentage of the remaining sorts of energy generated in France in 1995 and 10 years later.
- the table below highlight data on the number of travellers using three major British airport between 1998 and 2003 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The charts below give information about world spending and population Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 11
- The graph shows the rates of participation in three activities in a UK sports club between 1983 and 2003 84
- The charts show average levels of participation in education and the highest education level of adults from 2000 to 2010 in Singapore 73
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, if, similarly, so, whereas, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1186.0 965.302439024 123% => OK
No of words: 242.0 196.424390244 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90082644628 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94415379849 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69548213364 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 106.607317073 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537190082645 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 348.3 283.868780488 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 19.9412359838 43.030603864 46% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 107.818181818 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.54545454545 5.23603664747 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186281983808 0.215688989381 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0753056082722 0.103423049105 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.070310376676 0.0843802449381 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138240144446 0.15604864568 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0752229138243 0.0819641961636 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.