Nowadays, the soaring crime rate becomes one of the most pressing concerns. According to this phenomenon, a school of thought believes that prisons play vital role in declining the number of criminals whereas some people argue that community service is the best way to combat crime. This essay will shed light on both views before presenting personal perspective.
On the one hand, it is indispensable the importance of prisons in the process of preventing law-breakers. Firstly, when the government imposes strict law to maintain the position of society, as a result, the number of people who break the law will be controlled by means of arresting. In fact, prisons act a deterrent to limit inhabitants who have wrong thoughts. Furthermore, living in prisons also teaches imprisoners moral lessons to encourage them rehabilitating with community as well as develop individual skills to make ends meet. Take Africa as a typical example, due to the appearance of prisons, the crime rate has a tendency to remarkably decrease, from 16.9% in 2000 to 8.7% over a period of 20 years.
On the other hand, I completely agree with the idea of utilizing community service to tackle with crime for several reasons. This is mainly because the power of moral through community service can have an enormous and far-reaching influence on the awareness of people. In comparison with solving by law, such measures contribute to construct knowledge, understanding and adjust behaviors of citizens to live harmony with other people and minimize the number of wrongdoers. In addition, the cost of community service is much lower than that of prisons in the long term. Instead of allocating governmental budget to building prisons, national authorities are likely to use this gigantic money to educational curriculum to raise inhabitants' consciousness.
In conclusion, despite numerous benefits brought by prison method, I strongly approve the action of community service to deal with the current crime rate.
- the bar chart shows the percentage of elderly citizens in three countries in 1980 2000 2030 summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The chart below gives information about birth and death rates in Switzerland from 1970 to 2020 according to United Nations statistics Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The maps below show a beachfront area in Australia in 1950 and today Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The charts below give information about world spending and population Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 11
- International tourism has brought enormous benefits to many places At the same time there is concern about its impact on local inhabitants and the environment Do the disadvantages of international tourism outweigh the advantages Give reasons for your answ 89
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 272, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: comparison,
...nfluence on the awareness of people. In comparison with solving by law, such measures cont...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, so, well, whereas, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, as a result, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 41.998997996 148% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1675.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 317.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28391167192 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96442701435 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611987381703 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 525.6 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.7490938909 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.642857143 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6428571429 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.85714285714 7.06120827912 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.261564548656 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0794571726471 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0644202647578 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155265701316 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0480619600503 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.61 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 272, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: comparison,
...nfluence on the awareness of people. In comparison with solving by law, such measures cont...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, so, well, whereas, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, as a result, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 41.998997996 148% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1675.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 317.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28391167192 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96442701435 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611987381703 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 525.6 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.7490938909 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.642857143 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6428571429 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.85714285714 7.06120827912 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.261564548656 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0794571726471 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0644202647578 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155265701316 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0480619600503 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.61 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.