Some people opine that entertainment or leisure activities should be subsidized by the government.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own experience or knowledge.
There is no doubt that investments in recreation and entertainment should be the responsibility of local authorities. Despite many deep convictions about the role of government, I do not entirely agree with that, as people could benefit more from grants from authorities and other organizations.
On the one hand, there are a variety of potential benefits where the government could assist in subsidizing entertainment and leisure in their country.
In all likelihood, any investment for the public included in the relaxation measures would have to be controlled by the local authorities, which guarantees equality and systematic facilities in the society. By all accounts, any investment for the public included in relaxing ones should be under control by the local authorities, which ensures equality and systematic facilities in the society. In addition, governments could benefit from taxes and revenue resources from these recreation complexes. Therefore, the authorities are able to use these national budgets to subsidize other social aspects like public housing, parks. This means that citizens could also benefit from these benefits.
However, I also believe that not only local authorities but also other organizations and private individuals could contribute their own funding for the development of entertainment and exciting activities. It is clear that individuals and other organizations tend to detect the most recent donations and trends more quickly than governments. By continually upgrading recreation facilities, people can enjoy the most modern use. If governments allowed other units to invest in entertaining activities, they would be able to draw attention to foreign companies and their financing. Moreover, more people are getting jobs, creating personal independence, and reducing the economic burden on the government.
In conclusion, government investment plays a critical role in the financing of entertainment and recreation. I don't quite agree if people forget about the contributions from individuals and other units.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-24 | Lunar Tran | 73 | view |
| 2021-10-24 | Lunar Tran | 78 | view |
- It is more important for schoolchildren to learn about local history than world history To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- In many countries household waste eg Food packing is increasing day by day What are the reasons How can this problem be solved 84
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture many people around the world still go hungry Why is this the case What can be done about this problem Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 89
- Fossil fuel is the main source of energy In some countries the use of alternative sources of energy is encouraged To what extent do you think is it a positive or negative development 84
- The world s natural resources are consumed at an ever increased rate What are the dangers of this situation What should we do 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 111, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...cing of entertainment and recreation. I dont quite agree if people forget about the ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, in addition, in conclusion, no doubt
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.3376753507 240% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1754.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 304.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.76973684211 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22048713646 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555921052632 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 552.6 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.9870879623 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.933333333 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2666666667 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 7.06120827912 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191081737854 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0651870523918 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0328300593921 0.0667982634062 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11257499889 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0263432680635 0.056905535591 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.19 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.78957915832 163% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.