Nowadays scientists and tourists can travel to remote natural environments such as the South Pole.
What are the advantages and the disadvantages of this development?
In today’s society, technology has allowed individuals to travel around the world, even to some of the most challenging places on earth. Although this phenomenon might damage the environment ,it will contribute significantly to the expansion of human knowledge in the long run. This essay will discuss the positive and negative impact of this development.
On the one hand, visiting these seemingly far away places will damage the environment tremendously, which then affect the people around the world. The earth’s temperature is already sky- high, and natural environments such as the South Pole, or the Amazon rainforest are the reasons keeping Earth a habitable place. Various trips a year going to these places will produce a significant amount of greenhouse gases and waste, which will have a direct negative impact to these destinations since they are sources of air and water pollution. Furthermore, in order to attract more visitors coming to these places, companies will have to alter the place, removing animals from their natural habitats in the process. As a result, these actions might affect every human-beings, even those living in cities, which are often far away from remote natural environments.
On the other hand, ecologists have come up with almost all possible theories about the Earth, and only by going to extreme corners of the globe, they might have a chance of discovering some more mysteries. New explorations and studies in ecology will given us better understanding of mother nature, which will in turn help scientists come up with more ideas, even opportunities to study new fields. For example, more than 80% of the ocean remains unexplored, by going to these regions, scientists might have chances of finding and doing researchs on rare sea creatures, and unique species. These studies will contribute significantly to the development of human since it provide us with knowledge and valuable experiences gained through these journeys.
In conclusion, there are justifications to upheld and disapprove of both arguments to this phenomenon. However, expeditions to distant isolated destinations is more beneficial to society and individuals because of the positive impacts in scientific field.
- Nowadays scientists and tourists can travel to remote natural environments such as the South Pole What are the advantages and the disadvantages of this development 84
- Nowadays scientists and tourists can travel to remote natural environments such as the South Pole What are the advantages and the disadvantages of this development 84
- It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environment such as the South Pole What are advantages and disadvantages of this development Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge 92
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 92, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...als to travel around the world, even to some of the most challenging places on earth. Altho...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 191, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... phenomenon might damage the environment ,it will contribute significantly to the ...
^^
Line 5, column 252, Rule ID: PRP_PAST_PART[3]
Message: Did you mean 'give' or 'be given'?
Suggestion: give; be given
...xplorations and studies in ecology will given us better understanding of mother natur...
^^^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... positive impacts in scientific field.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, so, then, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1894.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 349.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42693409742 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93009049913 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575931232092 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 594.0 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.2337486807 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.285714286 106.682146367 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9285714286 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.71428571429 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.114227128601 0.244688304435 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0432443090831 0.084324248473 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0427411741348 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0658756928316 0.151304729494 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0357002507788 0.056905535591 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.0946893788 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.51 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.44 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.