Woven baskets found in prehistoric village of Palea seemed to have been made by the native people of Palea. But as per the discovery of archaeologists it is found that Palean baskets were used as boats to cross Brim River hence the woven baskets were not originally of the village Palea as they were used to cross the river. Hence, the discovery of archaeologists prove that the baskets were made in the village Palea but might have used as boats to cross the Brim River which is very deep and broad. These woven baskets are called as baskets but used as boat becuase they shape might have been similar to baskets and might used as boats.
The argument could have been strengthened more if more evidences of the use of those baskets could have been listed in the argument. The more the evidence of the use of the palea baskets more the argument that the baskets were not uniqely Palean. As it is said more the data more the observation and better the result.
Also, the argument says no palean boats have been found. So it is quite evident that the use of those woven baskets have been used as a source to cross the river as no boats have been found.
The reuse of a particular source can be seen in the village as the prehistoric times, there mgiht not have been an existence of a thing known as boats so village people in order to cross the river might have used these baskets to cross the river without drowning the deep and broad river. Because swimming is difficult in such deep and broad river. Also, the chances of drowning are more than usual. To save their lives they have used these baskets as boats and crossed river hence these so called Palean baskets were not unique and belonged to only Palens.
- Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed 66
- Woven baskets characterized by a particular distinctive pattern have previously been found only in the immediate vicinity of the prehistoric village of Palea and therefore were believed to have been made only by the Palean people Recently however archa 45
e-rater score report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 2.5 out of 6
Category: Poor Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 2 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 5 2
No. of Sentences: 13 15
No. of Words: 313 350
No. of Characters: 1377 1500
No. of Different Words: 115 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.206 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.399 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.111 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 66 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 49 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 22 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 13 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 24.077 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 12.419 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.692 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.449 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.449 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.224 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 1 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 301, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[5]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'used to crossing'.
Suggestion: used to crossing
...nally of the village Palea as they were used to cross the river. Hence, the discovery of arch...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...the river as no boats have been found. The reuse of a particular source can be seen in t...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.6327345309 112% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.9520958084 54% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 11.1786427146 89% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 13.6137724551 37% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 28.8173652695 59% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 55.5748502994 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 7.0 16.3942115768 43% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1400.0 2260.96107784 62% => OK
No of words: 313.0 441.139720559 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.47284345048 5.12650576532 87% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.56307096286 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.14459590894 2.78398813304 77% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 204.123752495 55% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.357827476038 0.468620217663 76% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 454.5 705.55239521 64% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.96107784431 20% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.76447105788 68% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.70958083832 74% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.22255489022 24% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 19.7664670659 66% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.8473053892 105% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.8616085386 57.8364921388 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.692307692 119.503703932 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0769230769 23.324526521 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.30769230769 5.70786347227 40% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 5.15768463074 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.25449101796 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.20758483034 37% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 6.88822355289 73% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.67664670659 107% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.334590928596 0.218282227539 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.15667634807 0.0743258471296 211% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113056548937 0.0701772020484 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.231922468604 0.128457276422 181% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0620640242245 0.0628817314937 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 14.3799401198 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 48.3550499002 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.197005988 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.94 12.5979740519 71% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.05 8.32208582834 85% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 98.500998004 45% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 12.3882235529 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.1389221557 104% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.9071856287 101% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.