Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Improving schools is the most important factor for the successful development of a country.
It might seem sensible some people believe the leading cause for development of the country is to improve school or education parameters. Although I believe education is the crucial part of developed nation, I believe political and economic stability is more correlated to be a respected nation.
It has been a popular belief the country who put education as their primary development component would be ended as a well-developed nation. Education, by some degrees, is the key reason to enhance the people standard of living because the educated person somewhat gets well paid job to rise the economics of their families. The more educated the person the more open-minded they would be and they can easily accept to the new ideas and learn something new to improve their skills. They also have more responsibility and discipline to perform a new task to reach their goals. Therefore, a well-educated person makes them more persistence and willingness to be a better social rank their root family previously stated.
Although education in some point is important, to be a prominent nation, the leader have to create a more political and economic stability to achieve the country’s long term goals. One nation cannot provide the suitable education if the country is corrupted or when economic growth is not acceptable. A true leader has to emphasize the political stability to drive the foreign investor funds to create bright future economic growth. If the GDP of the nation is high, the education’s budget was also increased. So that, I believe the key parameter to a successful nation is depending on its prolitical and economic’s level to support other criteria such as education or health.
To sum up, I believe on improving stability of political and economic aspect as the main factor to leverage the nation rathen than to focus only on educational post.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-27 | Er1c00 | 60 | view |
| 2022-08-27 | Er1c00 | 76 | view |
| 2021-10-27 | dedimaryono | 70 | view |
| 2021-08-21 | smnhmi | 85 | view |
| 2021-08-16 | souptikc80 | 73 | view |
- Imagine that you have been allowed to advise the government of a city or region area that you are familiar with to spend more money on ONE thing to benefit the city or region Which ONE of these do you believe would be the most beneficial for the city or r 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People today spend too much time on personal enjoyment and not enough time on more serious duties and obligations 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Scientists should be responsible for the negative effects of their discoveries 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is better to use your own knowledge and experience to solve problems than to ask other people for advice 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 570, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...he key parameter to a successful nation is depending on its prolitical and economic’s level ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, then, therefore, well, as to, in fact, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.0286738351 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 43.0788530466 39% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 52.1666666667 61% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1564.0 1977.66487455 79% => OK
No of words: 307.0 407.700716846 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09446254072 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89870437076 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 212.727598566 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.534201954397 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 516.6 618.680645161 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.4867805283 48.9658058833 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.307692308 100.406767564 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6153846154 20.6045352989 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.46153846154 5.45110844103 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0882861904214 0.236089414692 37% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0389200331636 0.076458572812 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0526968229933 0.0737576698707 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0682859798698 0.150856017488 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0382483407457 0.0645574589148 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 58.1214874552 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.1575268817 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 10.9000537634 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 86.8835125448 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 16.5 10.002688172 165% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.