Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Scientists should be responsible for the negative effects of their discoveries.
It is indispensable scientists improve our live through their discoveries and invention in science and technology. It might also seem sensible the discoveries they created have positive and negative impacts to the society. Although they are easily accusable for this negative impacts, I believe the discoveries are disintegrated with its utilization and scientist cannot be blame on them.
Each invention the scientists created always have the benefits and drawbacks. Even though they are not willing to commit any harmful desire, there will be always a side effect of the initial purpose. Take an example from the Manhattan Project in early 1910s, it was designed to collect all the scientist all around the world to create a subtle invention. However, it turned out to be the most devastated event, as its final output was utilized to create atomic bomb in the next world war. Other example, the invention of internet changed the way of our communication and the world became globalized. On the other side, it can be neglected there is many frauds on the internet and many users lost their fortune or deceived by criminals. So that, the effect the scientists’ invention always has two side of coin, upsides and downsides.
The one who is responsible for the undesired effects of an invention is its users. The rightful body accountable for any dreadful effects of the inventions is the person itself. For example, the science of telemetry is useful to navigate the global warming and mapping the polar ice melting. However, it also can be used to spy other country by any irresponsible government. Therefore, the scientists have no intention to do any harm, but the people who utilize it is the one who is in charge for.
Based on the aforementioned reason, despite many believe undesired effect of the inventions lie back to the inventors, I believe the invention and its utilization are disintegrated and the users is the one accountable for any effects. Government must take control of a new discovery in science and technology by implementing restriction policy. Otherwise it can be used harm anybody.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-12-26 | Cindy424 | 88 | view |
| 2021-11-10 | dedimaryono | 90 | view |
- Which one of the following do you think is the best way to get to know a city in a limited amount of time when you first visit it Touring historic sites going to markets or shops eating in restaurants or spending time in cafes 70
- Your friend is going to reduce living expenses what of the following way would you recommend to your friend and why Find a roommate or housemate to share the living expenses buy some technology products like the latest mobile phone less frequently shop fo 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is better to use your own knowledge and experience to solve problems than to ask other people for advice 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Scientists should be responsible for the negative effects of their discoveries 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 639, Rule ID: THERE_S_MANY[4]
Message: Did you mean 'there are many frauds'?
Suggestion: there are many frauds
... On the other side, it can be neglected there is many frauds on the internet and many users lost the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 345, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Otherwise,
...ogy by implementing restriction policy. Otherwise it can be used harm anybody.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, so, therefore, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 43.0788530466 58% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 52.1666666667 71% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.0752688172 211% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1767.0 1977.66487455 89% => OK
No of words: 348.0 407.700716846 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0775862069 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31911543099 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9174281323 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.525862068966 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 576.0 618.680645161 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.3794120014 48.9658058833 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.1666666667 100.406767564 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3333333333 20.6045352989 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.55555555556 5.45110844103 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22960528398 0.236089414692 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0714032693697 0.076458572812 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0478528974934 0.0737576698707 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145566815237 0.150856017488 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0601298438287 0.0645574589148 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 11.7677419355 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 58.1214874552 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 86.8835125448 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.