A few languages are increasingly spoken in different countries, while the use of others is rapidly declining. Is it a positive or negative development?
Several languages have increased their global coverage, leading to the decreasing extent of popularity of other spoken languages. From my perspective, language homogeneity exerts more positive effects than a variety of systems of words and sounds.
On the one hand, it appears that using the same languages can benefit information acquisition and conveyance. To be more explicit, effective communications require mutual understanding about the importance of accuracy, consistency, and transparency of used words. Sharing the same languages in various programs, such as medicine, technology, and science can accelerate the process of knowledge acquisition among people rather than information misunderstandings. In addition, taking global companies is an example. When foreign managers sent emails to report important affairs such as new business strategies, and additional details of new contracts, employers had to use communicative channels to translate them into my host countries. As a result, it seems that they miss out on important information and updates on account of a lack of disparities among demographics and cultures regarding languages
On the other hand, language variety can bring several merits. First and foremost, language varieties pave the way to explore cultures. It can be assumed that understanding many languages can gain great insight into national backgrounds, customs, and behaviors. Slangs, for instance, a popularly local way of communication in many countries, can help foreigners understand how they are formed and how important they are, avoiding unexpected tensions and having the greatest respect among them. Furthermore, traditional values are believed to develop sustainably. Songs, poems, or fairy tales seem to be preserved and gained inherited values among next generations. Therefore, multilingualism will be deemed to foster the civilization of mankind.
In conclusion, despite the great convenience of sharing common languages that facilitate information acquisition and conveyance, I personally believe that cultural identity and traditional values are probably closed to the diversity of language.
- A few languages are increasingly spoken in di erent countries while the use of others is rapidly declining Is it a positive or negative development 84
- A few languages are increasingly spoken in di erent countries while the use of others is rapidly declining Is it a positive or negative development 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 902, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...raphics and cultures regarding languages On the other hand, language variety can ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, regarding, so, therefore, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1840.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 309.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.95469255663 5.12529762239 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.28300204839 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.63430420712 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 577.8 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.2078569093 49.4020404114 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.666666667 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.46666666667 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.129396208236 0.244688304435 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0442011332812 0.084324248473 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0424546930923 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.083121973204 0.151304729494 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0516225471318 0.056905535591 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.0946893788 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.8 50.2224549098 51% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.23 12.4159519038 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.71 8.58950901804 125% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 78.4519038076 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.