Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better to take a secure job with a low pay than to take a job with a high pay but is easy to lose.
In today's hectic life having a decent job is so crucial for all people. One of the pivotal issues is that considering a career be secure or high-paying enough. In my perspective, having a safe and long-term job with low pay is much more worthful than a high-wage career with low security. In the following essay, I can elaborate on my reasons.
To begin with, having a secure job will guarantee that a person will rely on and for a long period have the same job without changing. To be more specific, in an unsustainable economic climate being in a stable career that you know has a constant paycheck can be valuable. Without any doubt, all parents are advocating other family members who are needed in many kinds of stuff, so they must afford all their necessities without hesitation especially food. Consequently, changing jobs all the time will lead to financial crises and will be detrimental to family economic stability. My own experience is a compelling example of this. When I was so young, in a course of time my dad was laid off from his work unfaithfully since his workplace has made redundant. I remember at that time many pressures imposed on my family to withstand my dad's unemployment situation and barely we could afford our accommodations, even though my mom was working.
Second, having a job to pay for a living is much better than a high-earning job that causes a lot of stress on individuals. More specifically, all unsecured jobs instinctively impose much tension and stress to employees that they may be fired without any reason. Such stressful circumstances will affect achievement in the workplace and itself increase the risk of rejection by the manager. For instance, When I was working in a private company, most of the time I was worried about my job security because I was living alone and I did not want to lose my job. This made me nervous all the time.
All in all, Having a secure job is much more beneficial than a high-income career. Because not only has the person a constant income but also does not bear many stresses.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-31 | Maryam_zn | 76 | view |
| 2019-12-06 | mheydarido07 | 80 | view |
| 2019-11-25 | green ni | 73 | view |
| 2019-08-05 | javadsafari | 3 | view |
| 2019-08-05 | javadsafari | 70 | view |
- Some companies provide important products or service but also damage environment Some people believe that government should require more penalty higher tax and larger fine of these companies while others believe there are better ways Which do you prefer 82
- Integrated Writing TPO 31 70
- Integrated writing TPO 55 83
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Advertising is the most important cause of unhealthy eating habits 76
- Integrated Writing TPO42 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 171, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e but also does not bear many stresses.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, if, may, second, so, for instance, you know, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 52.1666666667 82% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1700.0 1977.66487455 86% => OK
No of words: 361.0 407.700716846 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.70914127424 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35889894354 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85128624622 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.551246537396 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 549.0 618.680645161 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.8463015388 48.9658058833 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.4444444444 100.406767564 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0555555556 20.6045352989 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.61111111111 5.45110844103 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220125568242 0.236089414692 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0715918578607 0.076458572812 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0926502072622 0.0737576698707 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15873738294 0.150856017488 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0916843686736 0.0645574589148 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 11.7677419355 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 10.9000537634 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 86.8835125448 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.