Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better to take a secure job with a low pay than to take a job with a high pay but is easy to lose.
Finding a job with suitable properties is always a challenge for job seekers. There is a wide range of parameters to consider among which job security and wage stand out. People are always trying to find a high-income vocation to get their needs satisfied. It would be even more important when costs are rising, and willingness to have a more comfortable life increases. On the other hand, to address their upcoming costs, they want to get an assurance of their job situation. Overall, in finding a job, I believe wage plays more importantly. So I prefer a high-income job even it is easy to lose for the reasons that come below.
First of all, Low pay job may hardly meet your daily needs, but will not let you deal with any unexpected expenses. As time goes on, new costs will show up which you need a reliable bank account to deal with. It would be even more important when it comes to abrupt and necessary costs. For example, I clearly recall the years of my childhood, when almost all of our furniture lost in a fire and we had to replace them with the new ones. Getting all those stuff at once, which were bought gradually in years, was a big challenge for my father. If it was not for my father’s aftermarket account, we were not able to get all those furniture back again.
And the second reason is that by having a high-income job you would be more motivated and satisfied. If you get a noticeable amount of money out of your vocation, you would not be unpleasant about your situation. Whereas low payment job will keep you in a tense situation and reluctant to do your duties willingly. So it is logical to be more attentive, responsible and content with your duties at a high-income job. As an instance, I was working in a great office with a high and safe position but a low wage. After having a tense period, angry about my payment, I discussed it with my boss several times and finally, I quit.
All in all, in my point of view, the high-wage job is preferable to low-wage one. By low-wage work, it is hard to face unexpected financial problems. On the other hand by high-wage work, you would be more satisfied with it.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-31 | Maryam_zn | 76 | view |
| 2019-12-06 | mheydarido07 | 80 | view |
| 2019-11-25 | green ni | 73 | view |
| 2019-08-05 | javadsafari | 3 | view |
| 2019-08-05 | javadsafari | 70 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It's a waste of money for the government to fund space exploration. Give specific examples and details to support your answer. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is better to take a secure job with a low pay than to take a job with a high pay but is easy to lose 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Although science and technology will continue to improve the most significant improvement for the quality of people s lives have already taken place 90
- These days people people enjoy a lot of time away from their work and school obligations Many people use this time to visit new places and learn about them What do you think is the best way to learn about a place you are visiting for the first time Going 87
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 247, Rule ID: NEEDS_FIXED[1]
Message: "needs satisfied" is only accepted in certain dialects. For something more widely acceptable, try 'satisfiing' or 'to be satisfied'.
Suggestion: satisfiing; to be satisfied
...high-income vocation to get their needs satisfied. It would be even more important when c...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 628, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this furniture' or 'those furnitures'?
Suggestion: this furniture; those furnitures
...et account, we were not able to get all those furniture back again. And the second reason is ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, if, may, second, so, whereas, for example, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 45.0 43.0788530466 104% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1754.0 1977.66487455 89% => OK
No of words: 391.0 407.700716846 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.48593350384 4.8611393121 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44676510885 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6059209957 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.524296675192 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 557.1 618.680645161 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 19.2870872746 48.9658058833 39% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 79.7272727273 100.406767564 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7727272727 20.6045352989 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.31818181818 5.45110844103 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271126388614 0.236089414692 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0867499346854 0.076458572812 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0667200731474 0.0737576698707 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170755038736 0.150856017488 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0344801738452 0.0645574589148 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.6 11.7677419355 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 58.1214874552 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.1575268817 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.47 10.9000537634 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.35 8.01818996416 92% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 86.8835125448 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.