The maps below show the changes that have taken place at the waterfront area of a town called Darwin between 2009 and 2014.
The two maps illustrate how the waterfront area of Darwin town changed in the period from 2009 to 2014.
Overall, the waterfront area became greener over this 15-year period, with the disappearance of industrial areas and the birth of more trees. Besides some facilities for education, transportation and accommodation were constructed in 2014.
The most striking change was that all industrialized areas were knocked down. The town spent almost the northern part of the waterfront area on planting more trees. One new footpath was built across the green space. It leads to a brand new harbor which is used to serve maritime operations of the town.
It’s clear that the authority expanded the living space for residents by adding three more buildings close to the olds. In addition, they established a new university in the west. Next to the lake to the west, a small swimming pool was erected right on the site an old industrial area used to be, while two old swimming pools, school, convention center and fishing area stayed unchanged.
- The maps below show the changes that have taken place at the waterfront area of a town called Darwin between 2009 and 2014 86
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now and plans for its development 78
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010 67
- The map below shows the development of the village of Ryemouth between 1995 and present 82
- The maps below show the changes that have taken place at the waterfront area of a town called Darwin between 2009 and 2014 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 878.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07514450867 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72750306067 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.653179190751 0.547539520022 119% => OK
syllable_count: 256.5 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.1486963882 43.030603864 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.8 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3 22.9334400587 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.1 5.23603664747 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212449869949 0.215688989381 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0836663997755 0.103423049105 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.110212461366 0.0843802449381 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163463650185 0.15604864568 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.133828151927 0.0819641961636 163% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.