The map below shows the development of the village of Ryemouth between 1995 and present.
The maps illustrate how the village called Ryemouth changed from 1995 up to present.
It is clear that the village has developed significantly between 1995 and now. The initial impression from the maps is the disappearance of vast green space as well as the fishing port. In addition, the village’s infrastructure has been renovated with the birth of some extra facilities for housing, recreation and dining.
Looking at the 1995 map, there were a large farmland and a forest park located in the north eastern region of the village. However, they were completely destroyed to give way for a spacious golf course as well as two tennis courts at the moment. Going along the road to the south, we can see a hotel and a café which have stayed unchanged since 1995 while they erected a band new car park at the right side of the hotel.
Furthermore, the modification of housing amenity is also a considerable point when talking about the Ryemouth over this period. In the north, two housing rows besides the main road, have been spreaded with the appearance of two fresh ones. A new roadway has been added passing the housing square area and in that route, two houses have been constructed. The south west part of the village witnesses a rapidly development, too. The shops and fishing market have been replaced by restaurants and apartments corresponding. Finally, the fishing port no longer exists in Ryemouth now.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 400, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('rapidly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('development') instead of another adjective.
...outh west part of the village witnesses a rapidly development, too. The shops and fishing market have...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, finally, furthermore, however, if, look, so, well, while, in addition, talking about, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1185.0 965.302439024 123% => OK
No of words: 241.0 196.424390244 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91701244813 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70331233698 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 106.607317073 139% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614107883817 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 350.1 283.868780488 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.8806303649 43.030603864 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.1538461538 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5384615385 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.53846153846 5.23603664747 163% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220885581798 0.215688989381 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0836076243398 0.103423049105 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113191794257 0.0843802449381 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168007612445 0.15604864568 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.11821677906 0.0819641961636 144% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.2329268293 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 40.7170731707 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.