The pie charts compare some types of employment regarding men and women in the US in 1992.
Overall, it can be seen that the majority of employment patterns was non-manual jobs, while the opposite was true for male group. Furthermore, general laborers only gained the smallest preference among the world of work in both genders.
In terms of careers without manual working, the percentage of female group taking part in this area was much more higher than that of male, with totally 69% and 48%, respectively. To be more specific, 31% of the number of women choosing clerical or related jobs, nearly 5 times as many as the opposite sex. Standing at the second place was career relating managerial and professional with 29% for female and this figure was lower compared to male numbers. It is clear that besides 2 typical kind of non-manual jobs mentioned above, both genders allocated less labor to other jobs, at 9% for female and 6% for male.
As for manual jobs, the minority of people who pursue general laborers and the figure is nearly the same for both group. In contrast, the year 1992 also witnessed a significant reversion in terms of craft area. While about one-quarter of the total of male population spent their time on working with craft, the figure for women was only 3%. Moreover, nearly the same fraction between men and women who had a tendency to devote themselves in other manual jobs, reaching at 26%.
- The chart below shows the percentage change in the share of international students among university graduates in different Canadian provinces between 2001 and 2006 78
- The diagram below shows the steps in the process of manufacturing yogurt 78
- The bar chart shows information about fiction book sales from 2006 to 2010 84
- The diagram illustrates the process that is used to manufacture bricks for the building industry Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- The charts below give information on UK spending habits for books bought over the internet Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 110, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'higher' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: higher
...group taking part in this area was much more higher than that of male, with totally 69% and...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, furthermore, if, moreover, regarding, second, so, while, as for, in contrast, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1180.0 965.302439024 122% => OK
No of words: 246.0 196.424390244 125% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79674796748 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96035189615 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47035433465 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 106.607317073 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589430894309 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 364.5 283.868780488 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.0574698606 43.030603864 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.272727273 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3636363636 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.09090909091 5.23603664747 174% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0702871472736 0.215688989381 33% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0382491418977 0.103423049105 37% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.08522142658 0.0843802449381 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0928383606596 0.15604864568 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.119533054167 0.0819641961636 146% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 40.7170731707 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.