The bar chart compares the proportion of transport fuel that used in 6 EU countries when compared to the average in 2009 and 2010.
Overall, the percentage of fuel used in EU decreased in this period shown. Slovakia was a country that used fuel the highest in group and Greece was lowest.
In 2009, the percentage of average fuel used in EU group was 6%. There was nearly 1.5 times this number about demanding of fuel for stranport while was the number of Greece was 1/6 of average. The figure Italy and Australia were over 4,5% and 5% respectively. On the other hand, the percentage of France and Spain were similar with under 4%.
The number of people used fuel in transport sector went down 5% in 2009 in EU avegare. It is only Slovakia and Spain also decreased but this number for Slovakia was still higher the average about 1.5% percent. The demanding of fuel of Australian still stable while the percentage of the remaining 3 countries grown up 1% for each country.
- The chart below shows information about fuel used in the transport sector in different countries in Europe compared to the EU average in 2009 and 2010 56
- The chart below shows information about fuel used in the transport sector in different countries in Europe compared to the EU average in 2009 and 2010 56
- The chart below shows information about fuel used in the transport sector in different countries in Europe compared to the EU average in 2009 and 2010 61
- The graph below gives information about the number of cases of diarrhea in Mashhad between 1983 and 1992 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- Many young people today know more about international pop and movie stars than about famous people in the history of their country Why is this What can be done to increase young people s interest in famous people in the history of their country 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, so, still, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 801.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.60344827586 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41483967459 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.511494252874 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 238.5 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.0286380742 43.030603864 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.1 112.824112599 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4 22.9334400587 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.6 5.23603664747 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.330553040342 0.215688989381 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.15318802062 0.103423049105 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.155157849522 0.0843802449381 184% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.259048600748 0.15604864568 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.152650501844 0.0819641961636 186% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.9 13.2329268293 67% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.1 11.4140731707 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.02 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.