As moving to the cities helps people to have more job opportunities, many, especially youngsters, left their homes searching for a better life in rural areas. The result is quite visible.
In the agricultural areas, lacking workers delayed processes. Therefore, the products came out with lower qualities and pulled down the selling prices. Young people gone, staying behind are small children and the elderly, alone. Sounds cruel, but that is the only way they can guarantee the future for the ones waiting for them at home.
For big cities, more people means more supplies. However, it is a fact that the government can not save everyone at once, leading to an overwhelming population. The development process is bound to the increase of citizens, but this doesn’t the facilities of the cities can keep up with it. Every day, thousands of people wander around the roads to find a light of hope, no idea what will happen with them tomorrow.
To brighten the situation. There should be more approachable jobs in the countrysides so that work-seekers can return, and on the other hand, lessen the burden for cities. This will balance the scale, maintain equality.
- The movement of people from agricultural areas to cities to work can cause serious problems in both places What are the serious problems and what measures can be taken to solve this problem 56
- Some people say that all young people should have full time education until they are 18 years old To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, therefore, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 41.998997996 57% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 974.0 1615.20841683 60% => OK
No of words: 194.0 315.596192385 61% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0206185567 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 4.20363070211 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65933425263 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 176.041082164 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.69587628866 0.561755894193 124% => OK
syllable_count: 292.5 506.74238477 58% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.5920513739 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 74.9230769231 106.682146367 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.9230769231 20.7667163134 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.84615384615 7.06120827912 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.13963698733 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0396018930077 0.084324248473 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0301038587919 0.0667982634062 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0768916093537 0.151304729494 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.033854969026 0.056905535591 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.0946893788 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 50.2224549098 131% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.3001002004 67% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.24 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 78.4519038076 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 9.78957915832 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.