Some people say that we do not need printed newspaper any more To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement

Essay topics:

Some people say that we do not need printed newspaper any more. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

One school of thought argues that traditional newspapers are no longer necessary due to the advent of online news. Although Internet-based newspapers are indeed superior to printed versions, I believe that conventional news still plays a vital role in society.
On the one hand, there are two major reasons why many people eschew printed publications in favor of digital ones. Firstly, it is time-saving to acquire information online. News update on e-paper is much faster than traditional ones, provided with vivid images and videos. In contrast, printed materials are only published at certain times of the day and people need to buy them in person in newsstands. Secondly, it is free of charge to read news on the Internet. Most Internet-based publications charge people via advertisements on their websites, so viewers do not have to pay to read news which discourages people from buying conventional newspapers.
On the other hand, it seems to me that printed papers can not be dispensed with. One reason is that not everyone prefers online newspapers. For example, the elerly can not stay before the screen for a long time due to their bad vision and tend to feel more familiar with conventional publications. Furthermore, printed newspapers are not only a means of delivering information but a tradition. The image of enjoying a cup of tea with a newspaper on their hand has long been iconic in many films and books and become a habit of many people. Therefore, although people do not update news from traditional publications anymore, they still buy one annually.
In conclusion, it is indisputable that the pros of digital news outweigh that of the printed version, I contend that the roles of traditional newspapers are unreplaceable.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-11-14 trpg143 84 view
2024-11-12 Giang Tran 67 view
2024-11-12 Giang Tran 67 view
2024-11-12 Giang Tran 84 view
2024-11-07 hahoaan 89 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 173, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...aditional newspapers are unreplaceable.
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, for example, in conclusion, in contrast, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1464.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11888111888 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03455412771 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.555944055944 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 460.8 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.938063159 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.6 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0666666667 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.8 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167448338461 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0530266798393 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.033137602148 0.0667982634062 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0978850787638 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0352842642786 0.056905535591 62% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.