The best way to solve world's environmental problem is to increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is believed that environmental pollution is under threat of emission from cars and other transportations; therefore, putting higher tax on fuel is the best way to sovle this critical issue. In my opinion, this method is completely flawed and there are several efficient alternatives.
It is clearly that the cost of fuel has little to do with tackling problems of traffic and pollution. Living in a fast-paced and mobile society, commuting from and to the workplace is considered a must to individual so make changes in price of petroleum is wholly unnecessary and insignificant. In addition, the given policy would bear feelings of resentment toward the authority and raising many manifestations in the public intensely.
On the other hand, putting up price of fuel show greater effectiveness in many aspects. First of all, higher payment of fuel would bring on using public transportations, which reduce the amount of harmful and chemical exhaust from vehicles positively. Moreover, traffic trams during peak hour would reduce immediately since people shifted into buses, sky train, etc…., which result in relieving many roads from heavy traffic. Aditionally, there are many campaigns and projects which are worked on to raise awareness of protecting the ecosystem. For instance, in the current day, the government in many developed countries take cycling into consideration for not only enhance fitness level of the citizen but also cut down on gas emission from home vehicles.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that increase the price of petrol used for commuting to adjust environmental pollution is somewhat absurb and other resonable measures should be adapted instead.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-10 | tsln7607 | 78 | view |
| 2023-06-21 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2023-06-21 | Giang Tran | 78 | view |
| 2023-06-20 | Giang Tran | 78 | view |
| 2023-06-15 | Anhhhhhh | 78 | view |
- The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean Island between 2010 and 2017 56
- In the future nobody will buy printed newspapers or books because they will be able to read everything they want without paying To what extend do you agree or disagree with this statement 89
- Companies use a variety of methods to improve the sales of their products What are those methods Which is the most effective method 73
- Companies use a variety of methods to improve the sales of their products What are those methods Which is the most effective method 73
- Companies use a variety of methods to improve the sales of their products What are those methods Which is the most effective method 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, moreover, so, therefore, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, first of all, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1424.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 264.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39393939394 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01454234748 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.636363636364 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 447.3 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.570404695 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.454545455 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.2727272727 7.06120827912 174% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167850863086 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0583715509462 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0660988402178 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.099130997874 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.029472989242 0.056905535591 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.97 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.