Without a shadow of a doubt, leadership is one of the most essential mental spirits that people attach great importance to. A glance at people's attitude towards the generation of the leadership brings to a light question that has been asked several times, namely, how does the leadership form, it comes naturally or can be learned. Were I forced to choose, I would prefer the latter point of view to the former one and I will elaborate on what rationale my perspective is based on in the following paragraphs.
The first reason worth mentioning is that leadership is a kind of personality, in other words, it is similar to kind, honesty, or warm-hearted which we are familiar with. The generation of personal character is tightly related to the background he grows up in, such as his family and school. The formation of leadership, more often than not, is associated with a special atmosphere that forces people to think independently, embrace difficulties without hesitation, and face failures bravely. Those atmospheres are not customized to common people, which may help some critics to generate the opinion that leadership comes naturally.
Moreover, another significant reason I want to mention is that there are plenty of cases indicating that leadership can be cultivated through patient education. To illustrate more, business or military schools have set multiple courses to teach students knowledge about the leadership that they need to acquire. In addition to that information on texts, some practical cases are involved in their training plans, such as leading a team to participate in a commercial competition, organizing some students to launch a program, even taking part in a military simulation. Those practices do help students cultivate their leadership. Take the Westpoint military school as a compelling example. By using its strict standards, this famous school has sent uncountable excellent commanders to different places of the world and gained victories and honor on the battlefield. The example of this school can clearly demonstrate the cultivation of leadership.
A voice arises that there are some celebrities who have never gotten a chance to be educated of leadership but still have enormous influence across the world, such as Chairman Mao, George Washington, and Napoleon. However, this claim must be scrutinized meticulously. Admittedly those celebrities have no background of strict and meticulously customized training plans, but they are just rare cases. In normal life, more leaders have received professional training and education, and one can not deny that they are not great leaders just for their names are not listed in the history textbooks.
In conclusion, drawing upon the reasons I have mentioned above, I strongly hold the latter opinion. While there are one thousand Hamlets in one thousand people's eyes, I firmly believe my opponents will yield after being shown to my article.
- Which one of the following do you think is the best way to get to know a city in a limited amount of time when you first visit it 1 touring historic sites 2 going to markets or shops 3 eating in restaurants or spending time in cafes 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People who develop many different skills are more successful than people who focus on one skill only 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement When classmates or colleagues communicate about a project in person instead of by e mail they will produce better work for the project Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The best way to truly relax and reduce stress is to spend time alone 90
- cheatgrass is an invasive species of grass that is causing problems in North American fields 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 292, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...s up in, such as his family and school. The formation of leadership, more often tha...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, moreover, so, still, while, in addition, in conclusion, kind of, such as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 15.1003584229 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2469.0 1977.66487455 125% => OK
No of words: 466.0 407.700716846 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2982832618 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64618479453 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95029416579 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 273.0 212.727598566 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585836909871 0.524837075471 112% => OK
syllable_count: 774.0 618.680645161 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.6235068446 48.9658058833 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.45 100.406767564 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3 20.6045352989 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.9 5.45110844103 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181214710076 0.236089414692 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0494154397878 0.076458572812 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0329758666819 0.0737576698707 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0928478490374 0.150856017488 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0226723828224 0.0645574589148 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 11.7677419355 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 58.1214874552 68% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.1575268817 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 10.9000537634 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.42 8.01818996416 117% => OK
difficult_words: 137.0 86.8835125448 158% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.