Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Knowing histroy illuminates many of present-days problems and the study of histroy, even a little, is crusial for all people. Hence, schools force student to know about historical events. One of the materials that is still in the debate is whether universities should continue schools ways and consider history as a requirement or not. This may seem to be controversial at first glance. While some people believe that the strudents should concentrate on their major in the univerity, others holding colliding viewpoint. I firmly believe that histort should considere as a requirement like their major's courses. There are some advantages to this view, and in this essay, I will elaborate on two of my most important reasons.
The first and most important reason is that the youngers will be create future of the country. Their decision could affect their country, neighbors country, even worlds for decades. When they were child, they hadn't proper insight to judge rationally about the histroy evidence. So, in the educational period in the university, they should appreciate time to study history. One election can change the future of milions person. One fallcious mindset can affect the viewpoint of her/his sorrounding. In conclusion, It should be mandatory for all students to studey history.
The second noteworthy point I want to mention is that by recognizing history, it would be more cultural exchange and precieving diffrential culture. Unfortunatally, nowadays we are seeing racist worldwide. I believe that if a rasicm person study the pervious culture or histroy evidents of another country, he blames himself.
In sum, I firmly believe that history should be a requirement course in the university. Some reasons lead me to this view, chief amongst them is all the youth made the future mindset of their countries. Asides from this reason, by studying history can more preceive the various cultures. So for having thrive future, I suggest to the universty force their sudents to learn history.
- The golden frog is a small bright yellow amphibian that lives in and around mountain streams in Panama The species is severely endangered because of a fungus that infects the frog through its skin and inhibits the frog s critical life functions such as br 61
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People who develop many different skills are more successful than people who focus on one skill only Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statements Because people are busy doing so many different things they do very few things well Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 63
- Humans have long been fascinated by elephants the largest land animal in the modern world Social animals that live in herds elephants are native to both Africa and Asia Their large ears long trunk and long life span have made elephants one of the most cap 78
- Nowadays many high schools and universities require students to work on projects in groups and all members of the group receive the same grade mark on the project Do you agree or disagree that giving every member of a group the same grade is a good way to 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 210, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: hadn't
...for decades. When they were child, they hadnt proper insight to judge rationally abou...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, if, may, second, so, still, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 37.0 43.0788530466 86% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 52.1666666667 69% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1694.0 1977.66487455 86% => OK
No of words: 322.0 407.700716846 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26086956522 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78075720346 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 212.727598566 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.583850931677 0.524837075471 111% => OK
syllable_count: 520.2 618.680645161 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.3457755794 48.9658058833 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 80.6666666667 100.406767564 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.3333333333 20.6045352989 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.95238095238 5.45110844103 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.88709677419 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187051229403 0.236089414692 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0546852475883 0.076458572812 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0502886560352 0.0737576698707 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112256256059 0.150856017488 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0531815181701 0.0645574589148 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.64 10.9000537634 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.01818996416 114% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 86.8835125448 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.