The golden frog is a small bright-yellow amphibian that lives in and around mountain streams in Panama The species is severely endangered because of a fungus that infects the frog through its skin and inhibits the frog's critical life functions, such as breathing. Conservationists have proposed a few solutions to the golden frog's fungus problem.
Bacterial Protection
First, scientists have identified a natural enemy of the fungus: a type of bacterium. This bacterium produces a chemical that kills fungal cells. Scientists think that they may be able to introduce colonies of this bacterium to the skin of golden frogs. The bacterial colonies would then protect the frogs against the fungus infection
Breeding Frogs in Captivity
Second, researchers are considering the possibility of breeding golden frogs in captivity and then releasing them in the wild to replenish wild populations The golden frog can develop disease-free in captivity; where it is isolated from the fungus When golden frogs bred in captivity are released in habitats where wild golden frogs have died out, the frogs bred in captivity will give rise to a healthy, fungus-free population.
A Natural Defense
Third, it is possible that golden frogs w川 overcome the threat posed by the fungus without human intervention. Some golden frogs have what seems to be a natural defense against the fungus. When infected, they increase their body temperature, which slows down the growth of the fungus If this ability to resist the fungal infection spreads among the golden frog population as a whole, the frog population is likely to overcome the crisis and start increasing again.
Both the reading passage and the lecturer discuss the ways that the golden frogs can preserve themselfe from fungus. while the reading passage brings three redemies to save the frogs from the fungus, the lecturer finds these solutions ineffective and brings up some evidence to refute them.
First, the writer asserts a specific bactreial can protect the frogs. In this regard, scientistsn can introduce this bactrial to the skin of golden frogs. On the other hand, the professor believes that this solution not lasting for long time and has some possetive effects for a while. She says that after a while this bacteria stop to produce chemical substances to kill the fungus, so it's not permanent redemy.
Second, the author declares that researchers can introduce breeding golden frogs to a new habitats to replenish in new place. In contrast, the lecturer states that they are safe in new environment. The fungus can grow in the skin of wild animals that live in new place, and in the following can affect golden frogs again.
Finally, the writer acclaim that golden frogs have a natural defence to overcome the fungus. They can increase their body tempretaure to slow down fungus' growing. If all the golden frogs exert this defense, they can overcome fungus. Conversly, the lecturer says that this defensive solution need a lot of energy. By this redemy, golden frogs will become weak and ill. So it's not srong
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Leadership comes naturally one cannot learn to be a leader Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The rules that societies today expect young people to follow and obey are too strict Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 60
- Question Do you agree or disagree with the following statement When teachers assign projects on which students must work together the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects 60
- Scientists are considering the possibility of sending humans to Mars in the coming decades Although there have been successful manned missions to the Moon in the 1960s and 1970s Mars is 150 times further away from Earth than the Moon is Thus the project o 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Playing computer games is a waste of time Children should not be allowed to play them 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 118, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: While
...ogs can preserve themselfe from fungus. while the reading passage brings three redemi...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 315, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...or a while. She says that after a while this bacteria stop to produce chemical subst...
^^^^
Line 5, column 91, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'habitat'?
Suggestion: habitat
...ntroduce breeding golden frogs to a new habitats to replenish in new place. In contrast,...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, if, second, so, while, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 10.4613686534 10% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 30.3222958057 86% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1185.0 1373.03311258 86% => OK
No of words: 238.0 270.72406181 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97899159664 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92775363542 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36908104927 2.5805825403 92% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 145.348785872 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.542016806723 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 357.3 419.366225166 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.6394592003 49.2860985944 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.0 110.228320801 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8666666667 21.698381199 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.6 7.06452816374 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197023581602 0.272083759551 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0761399558154 0.0996497079465 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0638591728757 0.0662205650399 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126082463781 0.162205337803 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0522585335229 0.0443174109184 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.3589403974 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 53.8541721854 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.0289183223 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.2367328918 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 63.6247240618 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.