The chart below gives information about Southland’s main exports in 2000, *20…, and future projections for 2025.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words.
The given bar graph presents the total value of primary exports in Southland during 2000, 2021, and its projections in 2025.
Overall, it is clear from the graph that export in Southland had an upward trend in the frontier of International tourism, while the export of meat products saw a decrease over a 25-year period from 2000 to 2025. It is remarkable that the figure for dairy products fluctuated during the period.
In 2000, international tourism, with more than 8 billion pounds in revenue, was the highest export earner among the three industries. It continues to increase gradually and is predicted to rise further-reaching roughly 10 billion pounds and taking the lead in 2025. On the contrary, the earnings of meat products declined moderately from 6 billion pounds in 2000 to 5,5 billion pounds in 2021 and are speculated to drop marginally reaching almost half the export of international tourism in 2025.
Approximately 10 billion pounds of dairy products are getting exported from Southland, which went up by 3 billion in comparison to the export value of 2000. Nevertheless, by 2025, the data is foreseen to fall slightly by 0.4 billion. It can be seen that the value of dairy products is the same as that of overseas tourism, at nearly 10 billion pounds.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-02-25 | monmon12345 | view | |
| 2021-12-21 | nganphuong05 | 82 | view |
| 2021-01-20 | Аня | view |
- Some people think the newly built houses should be the same as the old houses in local areas Others argue that local authorities should allow people to build houses in their own style Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- The graph below shows female unemployment rates in each country of the United Kingdom in 2013 and 2014 67
- The pictures show the layout of a cinema in 1980 and the same cinema now 61
- The diagrams below give information about the manufacture of frozen fish pies Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 56
- The chart below shows male and female fitness membership in Thailand between 1985 and 2015 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
nevertheless, so, while, as to, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1061.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 214.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95794392523 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82475343497 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84321507345 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546728971963 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 294.3 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.4772675074 43.030603864 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.888888889 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7777777778 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.22222222222 5.23603664747 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.124147897358 0.215688989381 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0598244634038 0.103423049105 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0363361116193 0.0843802449381 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0909656918894 0.15604864568 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0250252119849 0.0819641961636 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.