In today world, people usually think that the museums or gallaries are no longer needed because of the development of technology which helps people can see artistic and historical objects on the internet. I completely do not agree with this point for many reasons, everything can change but the role of art in our lives.
First and foremost, we must acknowledge the benefits that modern devices can bring for us in seeing and figuring out the historical objects and works. Firstly, it is absolutely free of charge, you can use money for other purposes rather paying entrance fee for museums or galleries, time is also the benefit, just staying and home and starring the masterpieces of art, it would save a ton of time. What is more, there are various kind of artistic objects on the internet while in a museum you can only see the objects that relate to the theme of that museum, and sometime you can find it boring. Ultimately, you can study more intensive about the things through mumerous amount of documents on the internet that you can also see it in museums or galleries but just a litte.
On the other hand, it would be a criminal if we deny the advantages of museum or galleries. The first thing that it could bring for country is money, literarty and artistic heritage can boost the economy through attracting the tourists so do the museums and galleries, museums can represent the culture and history of a country, its feature to attract the visitors. Furthermore, museums or galleries have to exist as a maintainence of culture and history which the internet is unable to do. Lastly, when it comes to galleries, we almost think about the paintings, and just see it directly, could tell us what emotions and feelings that the artist want to express.
We can conclude that technology can make it more easy so see historical objects but the museum and galleries have to be maintained as the place to store the special items of country.
- The pie charts compare ways of accessing the news in Canada and Australia Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The bar chart below shows the number of miles travelled in a year by men and women for six different purposes in a particular country Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and makes comparisons where relevant 73
- In order to be successful in sport some people think you have to be physically strong Others say that mental strength is more important Discuss both views and give your opinion 67
- Completing university education is thought by some to be the best way to get a good job On the other hand other people think that getting experience and developing soft skills is more important Discuss both sides and give your opinion 73
- The line graph shows thefts per thousand vehicles in four countries between 1990 and 1999 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, lastly, so, while, kind of, what is more, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 22.0 10.4138276553 211% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1618.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 340.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75882352941 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29407602571 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57462329693 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.508823529412 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 507.6 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.2975951904 148% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 52.1455369595 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.090909091 106.682146367 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.9090909091 20.7667163134 149% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.36363636364 7.06120827912 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.32791571232 0.244688304435 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12978726362 0.084324248473 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0711095021998 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.21239401124 0.151304729494 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.065158418041 0.056905535591 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.49 50.2224549098 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.92 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.1190380762 138% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.