Given are the line graph and table illustrating the medium month to month temperatures and the common range of hours of light per year in three cities London, Sydney and New York.
It is perceptible that Sydney is the city with the highest myriad of temperatures and tends to increase while the opposite is true for London and New York in the line graph. Besides, the sunlight in New York and Sydney is similar, while in London is much lower.
Regarding the line graph, Sydney with the starting point of 25 degrees, temperatures diminished greatly in value over the last seven months before recovering and leaping significantly, reaching the original 25 degrees. Followed by London, in January reached 8 degrees then surge and peaked at 23 degrees in July, after plummeting to 10 degrees in December. Finally in New York City, the average temperature in January are only 5 degrees. After 6 months, the temperatures proliferate and reach the highest level of 30 degrees, before falling to the lowest level of 5 degrees even the coldest of the three cities.
When it comes to the table, by far the most hours of sunshine, New York and Sydney accounted for 2,535 and 2,473 hours, respectively. The temperatures in London are directly proportional to the amount of light shining there, reaching the lowest of the three countries at 1,180 hours.
- The aging population is good for business the economy and society Others disagree Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- The plans show the change of a small theater in 2010 and 2012 67
- The charts below show the proportion of people s total spending in a particular European country was spent on different commodities and services in 1958 and in 2008 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison 78
- The line graph shows the percentage of New Zealand population from 1950 to 2050 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The maps below show changes to the ground floor plan of a university department in 2000 and 2015 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 7, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
Given are the line graph and table illustrating t...
^^^
Line 3, column 357, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Finally,
...r plummeting to 10 degrees in December. Finally in New York City, the average temperatu...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, finally, if, regarding, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1116.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 228.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89473684211 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88582923847 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68854998386 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526315789474 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 336.6 283.868780488 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.07073170732 467% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.9020020736 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.0 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3333333333 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.88888888889 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1480738486 0.215688989381 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0676246420713 0.103423049105 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0726985899188 0.0843802449381 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108252486523 0.15604864568 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0840609699399 0.0819641961636 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.