Nowadays it is widely acknowledged that taking illegal drugs is becoming widespread among youngsters. From muly point of view, this might be as a result of the lack of control by parents these days as well as peer influence that can have healyh-related impacts but also lead to the collapse of societies.
There seems to be two main factors why youngsters are turning into the use of drugs. First, most parents tend to do not focus on child upbringing. They usually care about their work-related purposes like career progression or obtaining bonuses. Consequently, the run out of energy and are reluctant to spend their time with their children, hence no regulations of children. Second, children are also likely to be affected by their peers with whom they spend most of their time at schools. When they find that their friend is using drugs, they are tempted to do so.
Addiction to drugs can trigger various consequences. One of them is that constant use of drugs by youngsters can have negayive impact on their health. Their immune system can become weak as drugs affect eating habits, reducing the portion of consumption. As a result, these youngsters can stop developing. Moreover, the whole society can colllapse if significant number of youngsters become addicted to drugs. This means that the younger generations might be unable to initiate new projects that can help improve lives of people since they are not well-educated.
In conclusion, I feel that if we do not take measures to deal with this issue, the outcomes of it can be damaging. Perhaps, if parents allocated more time to educate their childrean and regulate their behaviour, children might not join to theri peers to trial some drugs
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of unemployed graduates aged 20 24 in one European country over a two year period 73
- The charts show how tourism to two countries changed over a 50 year period 62
- The chart below shows the changes in three different areas of crime in Manchester city centre from 2003 2012
- The chart below shows changes in three different areas of crime in manchester city centre from 2003 to 2012 90
- More people decided to have children in their later age than in the past Why Do advantages of this outweigh disadvantages 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, hence, if, moreover, second, so, well, i feel, in conclusion, in fact, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1430.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72997893348 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604895104895 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 426.6 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.7846619168 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.375 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.875 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.875 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.105862607518 0.244688304435 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0390053392149 0.084324248473 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0275044694173 0.0667982634062 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0674189868911 0.151304729494 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0161253986831 0.056905535591 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.0946893788 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.42 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.