The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.
Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant
These maps distinctively illustrate the difference in approaching City Hospital in three years. (2007 and 2010)
By comparing the 2007 and 2010 maps of the City Hospital, inevitable developments are noteworthy. The most significant changes that can be seen are the disappearance of the three bus stations on both sides of the hospital road, which connected the city road and the ring road, and the creation of the single large bus station on the west side of the hospital road.
Two roundabouts were built on either end of the hospital road, one at its interaction with ring road and the other with city road with both of them having an entrance to the bus station. Moreover, new public parking was constructed on the eastern side of the city hospital with the entrance in the city hospital on its west. The shared car parking was converted to an exclusive space for staff to park their vehicles.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-12 | muskan shaikh | view | |
| 2023-09-01 | vevinawynn | view | |
| 2023-09-01 | vevinawynn | view | |
| 2023-09-01 | vevinawynn | view | |
| 2023-08-24 | Chuc An | 73 | view |
- Please tell me How can I upload picture and give your suggestions in my essay.The following pie charts and the table show how three countries (USA, UK and Malaysia) deal with dangerous waste. Write a report for a university lecturer describing the informa 56
- The bar chart below show the number of tourists visiting two different cities by season 56
- Cam13test1task2 11
- Some children have a natural ability to grasp foreign languages and for that reason it should not be a mandatory subject in the academic curriculum Do you agree or Disagree 42
- The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 744.0 965.302439024 77% => OK
No of words: 155.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52844152537 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67867051995 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 84.0 106.607317073 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.541935483871 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 223.2 283.868780488 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.5494381236 43.030603864 143% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.0 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8333333333 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 5.23603664747 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228917592594 0.215688989381 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119878180594 0.103423049105 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0654870133892 0.0843802449381 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173917579775 0.15604864568 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0321580410797 0.0819641961636 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.73 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.