In the future, it may be necessary for us to live on another planet. For this reason, some people believe that we should spend money now researching planets that could be a possible home, such as Mars. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Some people consider that in the coming years, our life on this planet would be extremely difficult due to the impact of mankind's activities. Therefore the administration should invest more money on researching available conditions for living on other planets, such as Mars. From my perspective, I strongly disagree with this notion for the following reasons.
First and foremost, it is undebatable that humans are the main factors which have gradually exploited the Earth for years. For instance, major factories around the world continue to expel harmful gases into the environment and dump poisonous waste into the seas and rivers and governments continue to clear forests for housing and industrialization unabated. I believe, rather than looking for options for living on other planets, we must protect our own planet and mend our ways before it is too late. Money poured into research on Mars should be diverted to those companies that are researching environmentally friendly energy resources. For example, money should be spent on ensuring widespread usage of solar panels for energy and for ensuring widespread availability of recycling facilities. This is a much better alternative than spending money on interplanetary voyages and will help us all to rectify the mistakes that we have committed.
Moreover, there is no guarantee that once we leave this planet and inhabit the next planet, we will not do the same treatment with it. The destruction of the next planet at the hands of mankind would be no surprise. Hence, it is better to dump this idea and work towards the betterment of our own planet. Furthermore, living on another planet will have its own share of problems. For instance, who gets to decide who is to be shifted and who is to be left behind. All of these problems are enough to abandon this idea and serve to depopulate our own planet so that mankind can continue to exist on this planet.
In conclusion, I would like to reiterate that money spent on research exploring new planets for living could be better utilized to explore ideas to halt our destructive impacts on the planet and to reverse the damage that has already been caused because this seems to be a more feasible agenda.
- Some people feel that young people should follow the traditions of their society Others however believe that young people should be free to behave as individuals Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 89
- The charts show the sources of electricity produced in 4 countries between 2003 and 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- In many countries today people buy a range of household goods television microwave oven and rice cookers Is it a positive or negative development 11
- The diagrams below give information about the manufacture of frozen fish pies Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- In some countries owning a home rather than renting one is very important for people Why might this be the case Do you think this is a positive or negative situation 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 143, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...e to the impact of mankinds activities. Therefore the administration should invest more m...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, hence, if, look, moreover, so, therefore, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 24.0651302605 158% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1858.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 370.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02162162162 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38581623665 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77723711969 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548648648649 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 580.5 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.1643792808 49.4020404114 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.125 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.125 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.9375 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.407535626459 0.244688304435 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128730760351 0.084324248473 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0466024740935 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.253943973657 0.151304729494 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0164216848182 0.056905535591 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.