The chart illustrate the volume of waste manufactured in six countries namely Ireland, Japan, Korea, Poland, Portugal and US from 1980 to 2000.
It is clear from the graph that overall the quantity of trash production in US were remained the highest during over twenty years. Whilist the amount of waste production constantly increased between 1980 and 2000, the construction of waste in Korea decreased significantly.
The amount of waste production in Ireland, Poland and Portugal was the lowest in 1980, at 0,6 , 4 and 2, respectively. There are similar between Ireland and Portugal in producting waste, both of them rose sightly in two decades to reach the same results, at 5 in 2000. There was a small increase of more than 2,6 in the amount of trash in 2000 in Poland. Whilist the manufacture of wasting in US and Japan followed the upward trend except in Korea followed the opposite one in 1980. In two countries including the US and Japan were slight increasing more 60 and 25, respectively in 2000. However, this figure in Korea dropped steadly from 31 to 19 in 2000.
- The maps give information about a university sports court
- The bar chart shows the number of cars per 1000 people in 5 countries in Europe in 2005 2009 and 2015 compared with the European average Summarise the information and make comparisons where relevant
- The table below shows the amount of waste production in millions of tonnes in six different countries over a twenty year period 78
- The maps give information about a university sports court
- The pie charts below compare water usage in San Diego California and the rest of the world 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 11, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'illustrates'.
Suggestion: illustrates
The chart illustrate the volume of waste manufactured in six...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 94, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... Portugal was the lowest in 1980, at 0,6 , 4 and 2, respectively. There are simila...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 893.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82702702703 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70400177912 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567567567568 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 264.6 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.1835873576 43.030603864 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.2222222222 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5555555556 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.22222222222 5.23603664747 23% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158979997624 0.215688989381 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0725820415655 0.103423049105 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0506525130393 0.0843802449381 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129488822981 0.15604864568 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0435244980571 0.0819641961636 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.