the graph shows the number of visitors to a variety of art galleries in 2011
The given bar chart depicts the quantity of tourists visiting 6 art galleries in France, America, Britain, Korea, Spain, and Russia in 2011
As can be easily observed, Louvre in France constituted the highest number of sightseers whereas the modest was in Russia.
In 2011, the figure of travelers in the three first nations was noticeable and outnumbered the others. The number at Metropolitan Museum in America was precise at 6 million which was equivalent to two-thirds of Lourve. In the same year, Britain witnessed the number of tourists nearly the same as the USA yet slightly less than around 1 million.
In terms of other countries, there were not many disparities. The number of visitors in Spain was exactly at 3 million which was a bit over than in Russia and marginally less than in Korea. In comparison with the three first nations' art galleries, the figure for sightseers in Korea, Spain, and Russia was a half of both America and the UK and one-third of the Lourve.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-22 | hahoaan | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-16 | hahoaan | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-09 | trinhthanh1 | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-07 | hahoaan | 73 | view |
- The chart below shows the percentage of Australian people who were born in different places of the world 78
- Many countries import large amounts of food from other parts of the world Is this a positive or negative development 78
- The table shows the number of mobile phones sold in millions for a period of six years Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The diagrams give information about changes in a student s accommodation 11
- The chart shows the percentage of groups of companies in Australia which used social media for business purposes between 2012 and 2016 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 193, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: comparison,
...a and marginally less than in Korea. In comparison with the three first nations art galler...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, so, third, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 796.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 163.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88343558282 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57311423478 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66138900881 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.564417177914 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 236.7 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.2482372511 43.030603864 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.714285714 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2857142857 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.57142857143 5.23603664747 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143769934226 0.215688989381 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0612214603431 0.103423049105 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0434100155483 0.0843802449381 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0918984243434 0.15604864568 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0390889743525 0.0819641961636 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.